ISSN 1009-6248CN 61-1149/P Bimonthly

Supervisor:China Geological Survey

Sponsored by:XI'an Center of China Geological Survey
Geological Society of China

    • The Core Journals of China
    • The Key Magazine of China Technology
    • CSCD Included Journals
    • Scopus Included Journals
Advance Search
WANG Yao, ZHANG Maosheng, YANG Jianfeng. Evaluation Research on the Fragility of Geological Environment in China[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2019, 52(2): 198-206. DOI: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2019.02.021
Citation: WANG Yao, ZHANG Maosheng, YANG Jianfeng. Evaluation Research on the Fragility of Geological Environment in China[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2019, 52(2): 198-206. DOI: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2019.02.021

Evaluation Research on the Fragility of Geological Environment in China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 19, 2018
  • Revised Date: February 05, 2019
  • Available Online: July 28, 2022
  • Published Date: June 04, 2019
  • China's geological environment is fragile fundamentally and has great spatial variance, which greatly affects the socioeconomic development, such as regional allocation of productive force, engineering construction and regional territorial development. Based on the ArcGIS platform, an index system has been developed for the fragility evaluation of regional geological environment, which includes geological structure, earth surface landform and material composition with 9 first level indicators. After carrying out the Min-Max normalization of nine fragility indicators such as the crustal stability, the distribution of fracture zone and elevation, the maps of standard values of all indicators have been obtained in this paper. The correlation among nine fragility indicators has been analyzed by factor correlation analysis. The repetitive elements with significant correlation have been removed based on the principal component analysis, and then a new set of elements on comprehensive fragility has been developed. Taking the mean square deviation contribution rates corresponded to principle component as the weights, the comprehensive index model has been applied to make a comprehensive fragility evaluation of geological environment. Furthermore, with the support of location theory and the GIS spatial statistical analysis, the fragility of China's geological environment has been quantitatively classified into six zones:minor, gentle moderate, moderate, medium, severe, extreme fragile. And then, the spatial characteristics and regional difference about the fragility distribution of China's geological environment have been analyzed comprehensively. The results show that overall fragile is a prominent feature of China's geological environment, and the areas of moderately fragile and extremely fragile zones in China take up appropriately one third of the national terrestrial area. This is also the natural basic condition faced by China's national development and resource exploitation. The overall spatial pattern about the fragile degree of China's regional geological environment shows that the northwest is higher than the southeast, while the southwest is higher than the northeast, besides a little mosaic distribution. Taking the Helan Mountain-Liupan Mountain-Qionglai Mountain-Wumeng Mountain as an approximately boundary, it's found that the fragility of the geological environment in west is high, but the ones in east is low.
  • 中国科学院可持续发展战略研究组. 中国可持续发展战略报告[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2002:1-408.
    Sustainable Development Strategy Study Group Chinese Academy of Sciences.China Sustainable Development Strategy Repor[M].Beijing:Science Press, 2002:1-408.
    田亚平, 常昊. 中国生态脆弱性研究进展的文献计量分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(11):1515-1525.
    TIAN Yaping, CHANG Hao.Bibliometric Analysis of Research Progress on Ecological Vulnerability in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2012,67(11):1515-1525.
    吴次芳,潘文灿.国土规划的理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 2003.
    WU Cifang, PAN Wencan, Theory and Method of Land Planning[M]. Beijing:Science Press. 2003.
    景垠娜.自然灾害风险评估[D].上海:上海师范大学,2010.
    JING Yinna.Natural Disaster Risk Assessment[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai Normal University Master Thesis, 2010.
    刘勇.基于空间信息技术的土地生态风险评价研究[D].上海:上海大学,2008.
    LIU Yong.The Research on Land Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Special Information Technology[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai University, 2008.
    赵璐.基于信息扩散和模糊综合评价方法的矿产资源开发环境风险评价研究[D].四川:成都理工大学,2011.
    ZHAO Lu. The Environmental Risk Evaluation Research of Mine Resourse Exploitation Based on Information Diffusion and Comprehensive Evaluation Method on Obscure Information[D]. Sichuan:Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
    尹占娥.城市自然灾害风险评估与实证研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2009.
    YIN Zhane. Research of Urban Natural Disaster Risk Assessment and Case Study[D]. Shanghai:East China Normal University PhD Thesis, 2009.
    刘耀龙.多尺度自然灾害情景风险评估与区划[D].上海:华东师范大学,2011.
    LIU Yaolong. Multi-scale natural disaster scenarios' risk assessment and zoning[D]. Shanghai:East China Normal University, 2011.
    毕海普.三峡库区突发水污染事故的数值模拟及风险评估研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2011.
    BI Haipu. A Thesis Submitted to Chongqing University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Engineering[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2011.
    赵晓剑.水资源短缺风险综合评价[D].济南:山东大学,2012.
    ZHAO Xiaojian.The Comprehensive evaluation of risk about water resources[D]. Jinan:Shandong University, 2012.
    傅丽华.基于景观结构的长株潭核心区土地利用生态风险调控研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2012.
    FU Lihua. On Landscape-structure-based regulation and Control on Land-use Ecological Risk in the Core Area of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan[D]. Changsha:Hunan Normal University, 2012.
    宫继萍,石培基,魏伟,等.基于土地利用变化的民勤县土地生态风险研究[J].土壤通报,2012,43(5):1029-1035.
    GONG Jiping, SHI Peiji, WEI Wei, et al. Study on Land Ecological Risk in Minqin County Based on Land-use Change[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2012, 43(5):1029-1035.
    段海来,千怀遂,杜尧东.未来气候情景下中国亚热带地区柑桔气候风险度变化[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(6):971-980.
    DUAN Hailai, QIAN Huaisui, DU Yaodong.Changes of Citrus Climate Risk in Subtropics of China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011,26(6):971-980.
    姚华军,孟旭光,强真,等.北部湾经济区国土规划2011~2030年[R].北京:中国国土资源经济研究院,2011.
    YAO Huajun, MENG Xuguang, Qiang Zhen, et al. Beibu Gulf Economic Zone Land Planning 2011-2030[R]. Beijing:China Institute of Land and Resources Economics, 2011.
    中国地质科学院地质力学研究院. 中国区域地壳稳定性图(1:5000000)及说明书[M]. 北京:地质出版社,1997:1-25.
    Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. China regional crustal stability map (1:5000000) and instructions[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1997:1-25
    邓启东, 冉勇康, 杨晓平,等. 中国活动构造图(1:4000000)[M]. 北京:地震出版社,2007.
    DENG Qidong, YAN Yongkang, YANG Xiaoping, et al. Chinese activity structure map (1:4000000)[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 2007.
    JANSSEN M A. An Update on the Scholarly Networks on Resilience, Vulnerability, and Adaptation within the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2007, 16(3):240-252.
    MORTBERG U M, BALFORS B, KNOL W C. Landscape Ecological Assessment:A Tool for Integrating Biodiversity Issues in Strategic Environmental Assessment and Planning[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 82(4):457-470.
    AYALEW L and YAMAGISHI H. The Application of GIS Based Logistic Regression for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Kakuda Yahiko Mountains[J].Central Japan.Geomorphology,2005,65(1/2):15-31.
    BISWAJEET P, SARO L. Utilization of Optieal Remote Sensing Data and GIS Tools for Regional Landslide Hazard Analysis Using an Artificial Neural Network Model[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2007,14(6):143-151.
    DU J C, TENG H C. 3D Laser Scanning and GPS Technology for Landslide Earthwork Volume Estimation[J].Automation in Construction,2007,16(5):657-663.
    NOFERINI L, PIERACCINI M, MECATTI D, et al. Using GB-SAR Technique to Monitor Slow Moving Landslide[J]. Engineering Geology, 2007, 95(3/4):55-95.
    ZHOU J B, ZOU J.Vulnerability Assessment of Water Resources to Climate Change in Chinese Cities[J]. Ecological Economy,2010,6(2):106-114.
    SULLIVAN C A. Quantifying Water Vulnerability:A Multi-dimensional Approach[J].Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2010, 25(4):627-640.
    BRUCE K H. An Examination of Ecological Risk Assessment and Management[J]. Environment International,2006,(32):983-995.
    HOPE B K. An Examination of Ecological Risk Assessment and Management Practices[J]. Environment International, 2006,32:983-995.
    JOSE Miguel de Paz, JUAN Sanchez, FERNANDO Visconti. Combined Use of GIS and Environmental Indicators for Assessment of Chemical, Physical and Biological Soil Degradation in a Spanish Mediterranean region[J],Journal of Environmental Management,2006,79:150-162.
    LU W Z, WANG W J. Potential Assessment of the "Support Vector Machine" Method in Forecasting Ambient Air Pollutant Trends[J].Chemosphere,2005,59(5):693-701.
  • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 张景华,张建龙,欧阳渊,高慧,刘洪,刘小霞. 基于形成机理的石漠化敏感性评价:以贵州省黔西县为例. 沉积与特提斯地质. 2024(01): 162-171 .
    2. 刘淼,刘义,苗志加,许凯然,史佩东. 沁河流域上游沁源县生态地质脆弱性评价与分区. 中国地质调查. 2024(02): 97-107 .
    3. 时晨,王伊杰,孟冬,沈培培. 促进400毫米等降水量线西侧区域保护发展路径研究——基于自然资源利用视角. 自然资源情报. 2024(09): 34-38 .
    4. 王颖维,张亚峰,钱信禹,杨运军,崔继岗,游军,边小卫. 南水北调中线工程丹江源地区生态地质格局动态演变. 西北地质. 2023(03): 129-140 . 本站查看
    5. 董天钰,刘晓煌,常铭,邢莉圆,王然. 浅析地表基质的本质内涵及研究方向. 西北地质. 2023(04): 213-217 . 本站查看
    6. 孙智杰,曾嘉,王辛,梁川,余波,刘帆,王宇. 基于GIS的通城县生态环境地质脆弱性评价. 资源环境与工程. 2023(05): 560-566+629 .
    7. 张林,李来新,马东民,张佩. 景观格局及生态系统服务价值响应——以千阳县为例. 西北地质. 2022(01): 274-283 . 本站查看
    8. 王尧,陈睿山,郭迟辉,夏子龙. 近40年黄河流域资源环境格局变化分析与地质工作建议. 中国地质. 2021(01): 1-20 .
    9. 杜蔺,曾道国,李阳,苏永虎,巩鑫,文愿运. 论固体矿产绿色勘查的重要意义——以新民绿色勘查示范为例. 西北地质. 2021(01): 256-268 . 本站查看
    10. 孟晖,李春燕,张若琳,刘可,李瑞敏. 全国地质环境承载能力评价. 地质通报. 2021(04): 451-459 .
    11. 靳晓辉,樊玉苗,段浩,杨健,宋常吉,贾倩,胡亚伟. 银川平原地下水位对黄河流域水量统一调度的时空响应分析. 水资源与水工程学报. 2021(04): 45-51 .
    12. 张景华,欧阳渊,刘洪,黄瀚霄,张腾蛟,李富,李樋. 基于主控要素的生态地质脆弱性评价——以四川省西昌市为例. 自然资源遥感. 2021(04): 181-191 .
    13. 罗杰,王文科,段磊,李英,张在勇. 银川平原地下水位变化特征及其成因分析. 西北地质. 2020(01): 195-204 . 本站查看
    14. 李学刚,韩术合,燕鸣. 矿山地质环境治理保证金制度发展历程及现实意义——以内蒙古赤峰地区为例. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2020(03): 104-109 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (1713) PDF downloads (2503) Cited by(18)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return