ISSN 1009-6248CN 61-1149/P 双月刊

主管单位:中国地质调查局

主办单位:中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心
中国地质学会

    • 中文核心期刊
    • CSCD收录期刊
    • 中国科技核心期刊
    • Scopus收录期刊
高级检索

阿尔金西段库木塔什萤石矿床成因:磷灰石U-Pb年龄、原位Sr-Nd同位素、地球化学约束

高永宝, 陈康, 王亮, 赵辛敏, 李艳广, 刘明, 张龙, 王元伟, 张毅, 刘基

高永宝,陈康,王亮,等. 阿尔金西段库木塔什萤石矿床成因:磷灰石U-Pb年龄、原位Sr-Nd同位素、地球化学约束[J]. 西北地质,2024,57(4):1−20. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024038
引用本文: 高永宝,陈康,王亮,等. 阿尔金西段库木塔什萤石矿床成因:磷灰石U-Pb年龄、原位Sr-Nd同位素、地球化学约束[J]. 西北地质,2024,57(4):1−20. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024038
GAO Yongbao,CHEN Kang,WANG Liang,et al. Genesis of Kumutashi Fluorite Deposit in the West Altyn-Tagh Orogen, NW China: Constraints from Apatite In-Situ U-Pb Dating, Sr-Nd Isotope and Chemistry[J]. Northwestern Geology,2024,57(4):1−20. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024038
Citation: GAO Yongbao,CHEN Kang,WANG Liang,et al. Genesis of Kumutashi Fluorite Deposit in the West Altyn-Tagh Orogen, NW China: Constraints from Apatite In-Situ U-Pb Dating, Sr-Nd Isotope and Chemistry[J]. Northwestern Geology,2024,57(4):1−20. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024038

阿尔金西段库木塔什萤石矿床成因:磷灰石U-Pb年龄、原位Sr-Nd同位素、地球化学约束

基金项目: 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目“阿尔金卡尔恰尔超大型萤石矿带高氟岩浆-热液演化与成矿机制研究”(2023-JC-YB-241),中国地质调查局自然资源综合调查指挥中心科技创新基金项目“阿尔金卡尔恰尔地区超大型萤石成矿带成矿流体性质研究”(KC20230011),中国地质调查局项目“西昆仑大红柳滩-甜水海地区大型矿产资源基地综合调查”(DD20190143)、“新疆若羌县帕夏拉依档一带萤石、锂矿产调查评价”(DD20243309)、“阿尔金伊里奇曼-红柳沟地区萤石、金铜矿产调查评价”(DD20211551)联合资助。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    高永宝(1982−),男,研究员,博士,主要从事区域成矿及矿床学研究,E−mail:gaoyongbao2006@126.com

  • 中图分类号: P571;P597

Genesis of Kumutashi Fluorite Deposit in the West Altyn-Tagh Orogen, NW China: Constraints from Apatite In-Situ U-Pb Dating, Sr-Nd Isotope and Chemistry

  • 摘要:

    近年来,阿尔金西段取得萤石找矿重大突破,相继发现卡尔恰尔和库木塔什等矿床,但成矿时代和成矿机制研究薄弱。笔者选取库木塔什矿床与萤石密切共生磷灰石为研究对象,开展原位U-Pb定年、Sr-Nd同位素及地球化学分析,以探讨萤石矿成矿时代及矿床成因。磷灰石常呈自形–半自形结构,表面均匀,单偏光下近乎透明,主要与萤石、方解石、带云母、氟碳铈矿等矿物共生。结果显示,磷灰石U-Pb同位素年龄为(448±27 )Ma,成矿作用与碱长花岗岩侵入活动密切相关,均为晚奥陶世构造–岩浆活动产物。磷灰石中F含量为4.20%~5.12%,Cl含量小于0.02%,极低的Cl含量表明出溶的流体Cl含量较低。磷灰石稀土元素含量较高(908×10−6~2164×10−6),稀土配分曲线显示强烈Eu负异常和Ce正异常,且与萤石、方解石、碱长花岗岩有明显的一致性,推测与岩浆-热液阶段大量流体出溶密切相关。磷灰石的87Sr/86Sr值为0.70913~0.71047,143Nd/144Nd值为0.51138~0.51153,εNd(t)值为−13.3~−10.3,表明成矿物质具有壳幔混合特征。综合研究表明,阿尔金西段萤石成矿时代为奥陶纪,与同期碱长花岗岩密切相关,形成于后碰撞伸展阶段,成矿流体来源于碱长花岗岩的熔体–流体演化,为岩浆热液充填型矿床。

    Abstract:

    In recent years, significant breakthroughs in fluorite prospecting have been made in the western Altyn-Tagh Terrane, and Kaerqiaer, Kumutashi and other deposits have been discovered successively, however, the research on metallogenic epoch and ore-forming processes are still unclear. In this paper, the closely symbiotic apatite with fluorite were selected as the research object to carry out the main microanalysis of apatite, U-Pb dating and in situ Sr-Nd isotopic test analysis, so as to explore the metallogenic epoch and the genesis of deposit. The apatite often has a self-semi-automorphic structure with uniform surface and nearly transparent under monopolarized light, mainly symbiotic with fluorite, calcite, tainiolite, bastnaesite and other minerals. The study shows that the U-Pb isotope age of apatite microregion is (448±27) Ma, and the fluorite mineralization is closely related to the invasive activity of alkali feldspar granite, all of which are the products of the late Ordovician tectonic-magmatic activity. The F content of apatite is 4.20% to 5.12%; the Cl content is less than 0.02%, and the very low Cl content indicates a low dissolved fluid Cl content. The content of rare earth elements is high (908×10−6~2164×10−6), and the partition curve of rare earth shows strong Eu negative anomaly and positive Ce negative anomaly. This anomaly is obviously consistent with its associated fluorite, calcite and alkali feldspar granite, which may be closely related to the dissolution of massive fluid in the magma-hydrothermal stage. The ratio of 87Sr/86Sr of apatite is from 0.70913 to 0.71047, the ratio of 143Nd/144Nd is from 0.51138 to 0.51153, and εNd(t) is from −13.27 to −10.26, reflecting that the ore-forming materials have the characteristics of crust-mantle mixing. Comprehensive studies show that the ore-forming age of fluorite in the western Altyn-Tagh Terrane is Ordovician, closely related to the same period alkali feldspar granite, formed in the post-collision extension stage, the ore-forming fluid may be derived from the melt-fluid evolution of alkali feldspar granite, and it is a magmatic hydrothermal filling type deposit.

  • 大别造山带是中国研究程度较高的高压−超高压变质带之一,也是2个陆−陆碰撞造山后,中生代的岩浆活动之最强烈地区(Ma et al.,1998)。前人的研究表明,大别造山带在早白垩世发生了大规模岩浆活动(120~138 Ma) (李曙光等,1999Jahn et al.,1999Xu et al.,2007穆可斌等,2019张凯等,2020) , 侵入的岩体主体为中酸性岩,镁铁−超镁铁质岩次之,大量与其年代相近的中酸性、基性脉岩穿切岩体(王世明等,2010)。中基性岩脉的研究对于了解区域的壳幔相互作用及构造环境具有十分重要的意义。

    基性岩浆能反映地幔源区性质,成因环境和形成演化过程,能为底侵以及壳幔岩浆相互作用提供可靠信息,对大别地区镁铁–超镁铁质岩石为碰撞后侵入岩的认识已逐渐统一(Hacker et al.,1995Hacker et al.,1998葛宁洁等,1999赵子福等,2003),但对于大别基性岩岩浆来源存在较大分歧: ①认为地幔和地壳混合形成(戚学祥等,2002)。②由俯冲的扬子岩石圈地幔部分熔融产生(赵子福等,2003Zhao et al.,2005 )。上述岩浆来源的地质构造背景,前人将之归纳成3种观点:①观点认为陆−陆碰撞造山后环境形成于三叠纪时期(Chen et al.,2002Xu et al.,2007)。②认为不是三叠纪时期的陆−陆碰撞,可能与中国东部的岩石圈发生减薄构造事件有关,是由太平洋板块在晚中生代时期西向俯冲导致的(任志等,2014刘清泉等,2015)。③认为可能与岩石的部分熔融有关,该部分熔融是由地幔柱在早白垩世时期对岩石圈热扰动所引起的 (赵子福等,2004)。针对大别基性岩的岩浆源区性质及大地构造背景的认识还存在的差异,笔者以翔实的野外观察为基础,通过研究大悟地区出露的闪长玢岩脉地球化学特征,结合野外闪长玢岩脉穿切花岗斑岩脉的地质事实,分析闪长玢岩的岩浆源区性质及所处大地构造环境,探讨大别造山带的壳−幔相互作用。

    秦岭–大别造山带是扬子地块在三叠纪时期与华北地块发生俯冲–碰撞,而产生的高压–超高压变质带,东被郯城–庐江断裂所截,北连华北克拉通,南为扬子地块(图1)。在大悟地区早白垩世时期基性脉岩侵位分布广泛,种类较多,包括辉绿(玢)岩、煌斑岩、辉长岩、闪长玢岩等,有的基性脉岩切割或穿插晚中生代时期的中酸性岩体,基性岩脉的走向分布主要为北东东,北西向脉岩占据部分,岩脉倾角均较陡,与其围岩的接触界线清晰(王世明等,2010)。

    图  1  大别山地区构造简图(据索书田等,1993修改)
    1. 新元古代木兰山−张八岭蓝片岩带;2. 中元古代随县千枚岩带;3. 古元古代—中元古代大悟−宿松−连云港含磷岩带;4. 新太古代桐柏−大别−胶南杂岩带;5. 燕山期花岗岩;6. 断裂
    Figure  1.  Structural sketch of Dabie Mountain area

    闪长玢岩脉分布规模小,出露宽度为10~25 cm,延伸长度一般为1~3 m,围岩岩性主要为马吼岭群白云钠长石英变粒岩(图2a),个别闪长玢岩脉交截花岗斑岩脉(图2b)。

    图  2  闪长玢岩野外地质和显微特征图
    a. 闪长玢岩侵入白云钠长石英变粒岩;b. 闪长玢岩脉穿切花岗斑岩脉;c. 闪长玢岩斑状结构 (单偏光);d. 不规则状斑晶(正交偏光)
    Figure  2.  Field geology and microscopic characteristics of diorite porphyrite

    闪长玢岩表现为黑色或黑褐色,具斑状结构,呈块状构造。斑晶成份几乎为暗色矿物,少量基性斜长石,斑晶总量约为20%,暗色矿物绝大多数被碳酸盐矿物、绿泥石交代为残余柱状、六边形假象(属角闪石),极少数被绿泥石、白云母交代为残余片状假象(属黑云母)。基性斜长石发生交代作用被碳酸盐矿物所取代,呈现出残余柱状构造的型式。

    基质总量约为80%,成分主要由具碳酸盐化、钠黝帘化残余自形小板条状的基性斜长石组成,许多玻璃质充填三角形空隙格架内,无序分布(在单偏光下显浅褐色,外形呈隐晶集合体,在正交偏光下显黑色并具均质性全消光)、暗色矿物及少量的铁质矿物(种类有磁铁矿和钛铁矿)、微量的石英而组成变余间隐间粒结构的特征(图2c)。岩石中还可见一颗外形呈不规则状的杏仁体,沿其内充填着粗大粒状的石英晶体(图2d)。

    野外采集新鲜的闪长玢岩样品,在自然资源部武汉矿产资源检测中心完成样品的主量元素、微量元素及稀土元素的测试,利用X射线荧光光谱分析熔铸玻璃片法分析主量元素,分析仪器的型号为XRF-1500,对于分析精度要求精于1%,FinningMAT公司生产的等离子质谱仪(ICP−MS)测定样品中的微量元素、稀土元素,分析精度要求高于5%。

    闪长玢岩 (样品D2073/1、D2073/2、D2073/3、D2073/4、D2073/5和D4078/4)的主量元素和微量元素分析结果显示,SiO2含量为49.97%~55.01%,属于基性−中基性成分,样品号为D2073/2、D2073/3的SiO2含量较高,可能与脉岩侵位过程中与花岗斑岩发生交代作用有关。MgO含量为4.63%~5.49%,Al2O3含量为14.01%~14.65%,P2O5 含量为0.52%~0.80%,CaO 含量为 4.70%~6.17%,K2O含量为3.41%~4.39%,Na2O含量为1.82%~3.86%,岩石富碱,K2O/Na2O值为 0.41~1.11(表1)。样品中MgO含量与SiO2 含量相反,随之增高而降低,Al2O3、P2O5含量随SiO2含量增高而升高,表现出岩浆分异演化的一般规律。

    表  1  闪长玢岩主量元素、微量元素、稀土元素分析结果表
    Table  1.  Analysis results of major elements, trace elements and rare earth elements of diorite porphyrite
    样号D2073/1D2073/2D2073/3D2073/4D2073/5D4078/4BZK21-02BZK21-03BZK21-04
    岩性闪长玢岩
    Na2O1.823.783.862.123.571.924.414.63.21
    MgO5.384.814.635.164.785.492.242.73.39
    Al2O314.0414.4714.6514.1114.5214.0115.1815.2317.05
    SiO249.9754.6455.0152.2352.0650.0452.1253.2456.12
    P2O50.520.790.80.580.610.540.350.590.51
    K2O4.393.413.693.493.524.263.12.934.73
    CaO5.934.75.064.654.916.173.334.721.86
    TiO21.231.151.141.091.121.220.820.840.87
    MnO0.150.10.10.110.130.160.320.380.17
    Fe2O32.280.930.930.910.962.379.316.647.45
    FeO5.40.790.790.810.85.254.223.95.24
    H2O+3.140.280.160.190.253.28
    CO25.254.28
    LOST7.834.683.624.573.917.558.277.564.53
    Th6.7212.112.0912.0512.115.982119.9625
    Nb13.9420.7320.1220.6920.4112.2514.613.6317.1
    Ta1.071.141.141.121.150.810.920.891.1
    Sr625.321102.021112.551107.051109.42670.4213254.17363
    Zr218.8262.66258.98259.13260.32223.3241229.39280
    Hf5.095.965.935.955.915.5765.817.17
    Eu1.962.532.522.552.572.151.651.521.83
    Yb1.461.321.271.311.291.692.232.122.5
    La45.6881.4381.6181.4781.5853.0944.927.1945.4
    Ce91.52151.97153.01152.03152.8697.7190.956.9895.2
    Pr11.7216.3916.3116.4716.5313.3710.56.8511
    Nd45.7159.2759.7659.3559.6151.3239.627.0542.2
    Sm7.579.549.319.429.518.577.25.987.6
    Eu1.962.532.522.552.532.151.651.521.83
    Gd5.896.66.926.836.976.815.285.035.98
    Tb0.820.790.780.790.770.960.760.720.82
    Dy3.873.883.873.863.894.44.213.864.69
    Ho0.70.650.660.640.660.820.830.730.87
    Er1.691.711.711.751.732.012.292.132.51
    Tm0.240.230.220.250.220.280.340.30.38
    Yb1.461.321.271.311.291.692.232.122.5
    Lu0.220.190.20.180.210.270.350.320.4
    Y17.319.4819.0219.4319.2920.7924.722.4526.9
    总和236.35355.98357.17356.33357.65264.24235.74163.23248.28
    LREE/HREE9.4513.6213.9713.6413.798.756.344.486.06
    (La/Yb)N21.0921.1841.5943.3241.9342.6413.578.6512.24
    δEu0.870.840.910.930.920.930.810.870.89
     注:主量元素含量%,稀土与微量元素含量10−6
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    闪长玢岩稀土总量为219.04×10−6~338.08×10−6。其中,轻重稀土比为13.29~20.74,平均值为17.05。Zr含量为218.8×10−6~262.66×10−6,Y含量为17.3×10−6~20.79×10−6表1),Nb异常值0.16~0.25,(La/Yb)N值为21.21~43.34,表明闪长玢岩轻稀土富集,轻、重稀土分异程度较大,整体表现为右倾型,较陡(图3a)。其中,样品的δEu值为0.84~0.93,负异常不明显,说明斜长石结晶分异作用较弱(刘军等,2022)。大悟地区的闪长玢岩样品脉稀土配分模式总体同安徽庐枞地区的闪长玢岩类似,显示为右倾型特征,稀土模式表明LREE富集、HREE亏损,但庐枞盆地的样品稀土配分更平缓。

    图  3  闪长玢岩球粒陨石标准化稀土配分模式(a)和原始地幔标准化微量元素蛛网图(b)
    庐枞盆地样品转引自汪晶等(2014);球粒陨石和原始地幔标准化值据Mcdonough等(1995)
    Figure  3.  (a) Normalized REE distribution pattern of diorite porphyrite chondrite and(b) primitive mantle normalized trace element spider web

    微量元素蛛网图显示闪长玢岩的微量元素分配型式整体变化趋势相近(图3b),亏损高场强元素Nb、Ta、Hf、Ti,富集元素Gd、Nd、Sr、Th,可能与俯冲板片形成的熔体有关。庐枞盆地闪长玢岩的蛛网图也表现出亏损高场强元素Nb、Ta、Hf、Ti,大离子亲石元素Th等富集,Sr元素不同程度亏损,可能受到了地幔交代作用和斜长石的分离结晶作用的影响(汪晶等,2014)。

    野外出露特征显示闪长玢岩脉晚期侵入至花岗斑岩体中,因此其形成时代应该略晚于或晚于该花岗斑岩结晶年代。曹正琦(2016)通过锆石U–Pb定年测试获得研究区花岗斑岩的侵位年龄为(130.8±1.8)Ma,本研究中的闪长玢岩岩浆结晶年龄应晚于花岗斑岩侵位年龄。范裕等(2010)在宁芜盆地中利用LA–ICP–MS同位素定年方法获得闪长玢岩中同位素锆石U–Pb年龄为(130.2±2.0)Ma。黄丹峰等(2010)在大别山北缘利用SHRIMP同位素定年方法得到闪长玢岩中同位素锆石U–Pb年龄为(129.1±2.2)Ma。综上所述,西大别大悟地区闪长玢岩的形成很可能约为130 Ma。

    闪长玢岩的岩石地球化学烧失量为3.62%~7.83%,表明样品遭受一定程度蚀变。Nb、Ti、Zr等不相容元素具有活动性小,对岩石风化、交代和蚀变等作用过程反应不灵敏,利用与其他元素的图解,讨论相关元素的活动特点(Gibson et al.,1982),可以为岩石源区地幔性质和成分提供信息。

    脉岩是母岩浆的代表,能有效反映源区物质组成(Westerman et al.,2003),闪长玢岩脉具有较低SiO2含量(49.97%~55.01%)、MgO含量(4.63%~5.49%),较高Al2O3含量(14.01%~14.65%)、 FeO*含量(1.63%~7.45%),壳源混染会使岩浆中SiO2含量明显增高、降低MgO值,但脉岩的SiO2−MgO不相关,说明壳源混染对脉岩影响不大。其次脉岩中微量元素、稀土元素含量变化不大,表明脉岩的岩浆在上升时没有受到壳源混染作用的干扰。轻稀土富集,轻、重稀土分异的程度较大,整体表现为较陡右倾型,(La/Yb)N值为21.21~43.34,δEu值为0.84~0.93,负异常不明显,表明在岩浆源区没有残留斜长石,而存在石榴子石和金红石残留,说明脉岩的岩浆来自深度较大(俞胜等,2022)。 Mg#值为60.17~90.19,大于下地壳的熔融产物Mg#值<40(Rapp et al.,1995); Nb/Ta值为13.06~18.47,大于地壳平均值(11.4)(Rudnik et al.,2003),接近于地幔值(17. 5±2) (Hofmann,1988Green,1995);Zr/Hf值为40.09~44.05,接近于地幔值(36.7),样品投点均接近于Zr–Y图解的富集地幔区域(图4),表明脉岩的岩浆源区可能来自于富集地幔,与安徽庐枞盆地闪长玢岩的Sr–Nd–Pb同位素特征反映富集地幔岩浆源区的认识较为一致(汪晶等,2014)。

    图  4  闪长玢岩Zr−Y判别图解(据Maitre et al.,1989
    Figure  4.  Zr−Y discrimination diagram of diorite porphyrite

    从三叠纪开始,扬子板块俯冲碰撞华北板块后,区域岩石圈地幔成分变化较大,早白垩世时期,中国东部岩石圈拉张构造事件对大别造山带产生影响,大量镁铁–超镁铁质岩体侵位至西大别地区,其同位素显示出富集特征(εNdt<−12),Zr−Y判别图解显示闪长玢岩样品均靠近富集地幔(图4)。以上特征表明区域岩浆源区为富集地幔(王世明等,2010)。

    微量元素蛛网图分配型式的变化趋势表现为整体相近,亏损不相容元素Nb、Ta、Hf、Ti;富集亲石元素Sr,其中不相容元素Nb、Ta的亏损是由板块俯冲时岩浆喷发造成(Gill,1981),脉岩Nb异常值范围0.16~0.25,Nb的负异常特征通常被认为是俯冲带上火山岩或者陆壳岩石的明显特征(Jahn et al.,1999),微量元素特征可能是与俯冲板片作用相关的岩石圈地幔部分熔融有关(Pearce et al.,1995彭松柏等,2016),与庐枞盆地中受古板块俯冲交代作用影响而形成的火山岩类似(袁峰等,2008),岩石中Sr含量为625.32×10−6~1112.55×10−6,明显高于地幔值(17.8×10−6)(Taylor et al.,1985),暗示脉岩的岩浆源区受到了俯冲板片流体交代作用的影响,使Sr含量增高(McCulloch et al.,1991),深俯冲大陆岩石圈可能在上地幔顶部滞留几十甚至上百个百万年之后,才形成熔融岩浆(赵子福等,2004)。从闪长玢岩的野外空间分布形态(图2a图2b),间接反映了地区断裂构造结构面力学性质和断裂结构特征,大致可以辨别该脉岩充填的裂隙具剪张性,符合镁铁质岩浆贯入长英质岩浆结晶度及流变学特征的4个阶段混合模式,第一阶段为长英质岩浆结晶;第二阶段为花岗质岩浆近处于固态,在应力作用下产生岩石裂隙;第三阶段为具流变特征的基性岩浆注入到已经形成的花岗岩石裂隙,并在局部与其发生化学反应,形成具两者特性的复合岩墙,闪长玢岩呈角砾或锯齿状斑块产出;第四阶段为花岗质岩石已经固结,同时较为连续的基性岩墙(Fernandez et al.,1991)。区域深部的岩浆源区可能存在镁铁质和花岗质2种类型岩浆,前者可能稍晚侵位至后者,两者进一步进行混合作用。

    综上所述,闪长玢岩脉的地球化学特征综合显示其岩浆来源于富集地幔,但俯冲而来的板片流体与其发生交代作用,使基性脉岩兼具俯冲作用的地球化学特征,该脉岩的岩浆源区可能受到了富集地幔与俯冲板片流体交代作用的影响,花岗斑岩、闪长玢岩为造山后伸展−拉张环境下形成的脉岩组合 。

    脉岩是研究深部岩石圈动力演化过程的重要“探针”(Poland et al.,2004),脉岩一般认为是岩浆在区域性地壳在拉张作用下而形成,对研究区域构造演化具有十分重要的意义(Halls,1982),闪长玢岩脉岩地球化学特征为中基性岩,TiO2–K2O–P2O5判别图解显示样品均落于大陆玄武岩区(图5a),TiO2–Zr(P2O5×10000)图解显示脉岩样品属于拉斑玄武岩系列(图5b),与庐枞盆地的样品均为板内玄武岩(图5c),Th/Nb值为0.48~0.60,Nb/Zr值为0.05~0.08,符合大陆拉张带玄武岩特征(0.27<Th/Nb<0.67,Nb/Zr>0.04)(孙书勤等,2003);且脉岩样品均落于Th/Hf−Ta/Hf图解的大陆拉张带玄武岩区(图5d)。

    图  5  TiO2−K2O−P2O5判别图解(a)(Pearce,1975); TiO2−Zr(P2O5×10000)判别图解(b)(Winchester et al.,1976);Ti−Zr判别图解(c)(Pearce et al.,1973);Th/Hf−Ta/Hf判别图解(d)(据汪云亮等,2001
    Ⅰ.板块发散边缘区(N−MORB);Ⅱ1.大洋岛弧玄武岩;Ⅱ2.陆缘岛弧及陆缘火山弧玄武岩;Ⅲ.大洋板内洋岛、海山玄武岩区及T−MORB、E−MORB区;Ⅳ1.陆内裂谷及陆缘裂谷拉斑玄武岩区;Ⅳ2.陆内裂谷碱性玄武岩区;Ⅳ3.大陆拉张带(或初始裂谷)玄武岩区;Ⅴ.地幔热柱玄武岩区
    Figure  5.  (a) Discriminant diagram of TiO2−K2O−P2O5, (b) Discriminant diagram of TiO2−Zr (P2O5×10000),(c) TiZr discriminant diagram, and (d) Th/ Hf−Ta/Hf discrimination diagram

    大别地区位于华北板块与扬子板块之间,是苏鲁−大别超高压变质带的重要组成部分,经历了洋−陆碰撞、陆−陆碰撞等构造演化过程。前人研究显示,大别地区的高压与超高压榴辉岩相反映了扬子地块陆壳向北俯冲至华北陆块之下, 240~220 Ma是其变质作用发生的重要时期,即大别造山带形成时间 (Li et al. ,1993Hacker et al.,1998李曙光等,2005刘福来等,2006);碰撞造山导致地壳增厚(Leech et al. ,2001),随后出现应力松弛,区域应力状态从挤压转换到伸展,由伸展作用所引起的花岗岩侵位,通常会稍晚于区域地壳部分熔融,所以加厚地壳部分熔融作用发生时间通常被当作区域构造体制开始转换时间的最低值(David et al.,2001Whitney et al.,2003)。马昌前等(2003)通过研究大别地区镁铁质岩石侵位年代学和花岗岩侵位年代学以及分别分析其岩石地化综合特征,认为135 Ma是区域地壳构造体制的转换时间。吴元保等(2001)以北大别地区岩石发生混合岩化时的年代学证据为依据,分析认为(137±4)Ma是大别地区从挤压向伸展发生转换的时间;并提出早白垩世大别造山带发生伸展垮塌,发生大量中酸性花岗岩侵位。吴开彬等(2013)通过对比西大别石鼓尖岩体、天堂寨岩体、薄刀峰岩体的Sr同位素比值及结晶年龄,将其分为三期,第一期石鼓尖岩体具同构造侵位变形特征,反映了挤压环境;第二期天堂寨岩体,变形发育在接触带和剪切带内,暗示着大别造山带的伸展垮塌;第三期薄刀尖岩体无变质变形,被认为是形成于大别造山带垮塌之后,反映了伸展环境。根据笔者对岩石地球化学特征研究及野外地质特征,认为大悟地区闪长玢岩为板内拉斑玄武岩系列,反映了大陆拉张构造环境,结合闪长玢岩脉侵位时代为早白垩世。因此,大悟地区早白垩世闪长玢岩形成于造山后大陆拉张环境,与前人认为大别造山带伸展时期较为一致(吴开彬等,2013)。

    (1)岩石地球化学特征显示,闪长玢岩属于中基性岩,为大陆拉斑玄武岩系列;稀土元素有较高的总量,稀土配分模式显示强烈富集轻稀土的右倾型,亏损不相容元素Nb、Ta、Hf、Ti;大离子亲石元素Sr富集。

    (2)研究区闪长玢岩脉的岩浆源区可能受到了俯冲板片流体交代作用的影响,地球化学特征综合显示其可能来源于富集地幔;

    (3)脉岩野外地质特征及前人研究资料表明,闪长玢岩侵位于早白垩世,为大别造山后伸展−拉张环境下形成的脉岩。

    致谢:衷心感谢中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心陈隽璐正高级工程师对论文写作的指导!

  • 图  1   阿尔金西段卡尔恰尔-库木塔什超大型萤石矿带地质矿产图

    ①. 年代学数据来源于张若愚等(2016);②. 年代学数据来源于赵辛敏等(2023);③. 年代学数据来源于高永宝等(2023);④. 本文数据

    Figure  1.   Geological map of the super-large Kaerqiaer-Kumutashi fluorite mineralization belt in the West Altyn-Tagh Orogen

    图  2   库木塔什萤石矿区地质图

    Figure  2.   Geological map of the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    图  3   库木塔什萤石矿区磷灰石野外及镜下特征

    a. 萤石方解石脉;b. 方解石萤石矿石(共生磷灰石);c. 磷灰石单矿物;d. 自形柱状磷灰石被包含于带云母、萤石中(单偏光);e. 萤石交代磷灰石(单偏光);f. 萤石交代方解石、磷灰石(单偏光);g. 磷灰石阴极发光(CL)图像;h. 磷灰石与萤石、方解石共生(背散射);i. 氟碳铈矿与萤石、方解石共生(背散射);Ap. 磷灰石;Bsn. 氟碳铈矿;Tai. 带云母;Cal. 方解石;Fl. 萤石;Pst. 氟碳钙铈矿

    Figure  3.   Characteristics of apatite from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    图  4   磷灰石的CL图像和U-Pb谐和图

    Figure  4.   Apatite CL images and U-Pb diagram from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    图  5   库木塔什萤石矿区磷灰石SiO2-MnO图解(据Zhao et al., 2020

    Figure  5.   SiO2-MnO diagram of apatite from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    图  6   库木塔什萤石矿床中磷灰石Sr-Y与Sr-Mn图解

    Figure  6.   Sr-Y and Sr-Mn diagrams of apatite from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    图  7   库木塔什萤石矿区岩体与不同矿物地球化学协变图

    a. (Ce/Yb)N和Sr元素含量(10−6)投图;b. Th/U和Sr元素含量(10−6)投图;c. La/Yb和Sr元素含量投图;d. Eu*和Sr/Y投图

    Figure  7.   Comparison of geochemical characteristics of apatite from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    图  8   库木塔什矿区岩体及不同矿物稀土元素配分模式图

    Figure  8.   Distribution of the rare-earth elements from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    图  9   库木塔什萤石矿区87Sr/86Sr-143Nd/144Nd图解

    Figure  9.   87Sr/86Sr-143Nd/144Nd diagram from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    图  10   卡尔恰尔超大型萤石矿带区域成矿模式图

    Figure  10.   Regional metallogenic model of Kaerqiaer Super-large Fluorite Zone

    表  1   库木塔什萤石矿区磷灰石主量元素含量(%)

    Table  1   Major elements composition (%) of apatite from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    样号 F SiO2 P2O5 Na2O SrO FeO MnO CaO Cl BaO Total F/Cl
    01 4.47 0.15 40.7 0.25 0.12 / 0.06 55.7 0.01 0.16 99.7 745
    02 4.39 0.07 41.3 0.23 0.13 0.05 0.04 55.7 0.01 0.10 100 399
    03 4.48 0.14 40.4 0.25 0.08 0.03 0.04 56.1 0.02 0.05 99.7 213
    04 4.86 0.14 40.6 0.23 0.19 / 0.02 55.7 0.01 0.10 99.8 374
    05 4.60 / 41.3 0.45 0.08 0.02 0.01 55.5 0.01 0.01 100 418
    06 5.12 0.15 40.6 0.29 0.13 0.04 / 55.5 0.01 / 99.7 639
    07 4.59 0.27 40.3 0.22 0.06 0.06 / 55.9 0.01 0.08 99.5 656
    08 4.66 0.15 41.1 0.17 0.14 0.03 / 55.5 0.02 / 99.8 194
    09 5.04 0.22 41.2 0.27 0.07 / 0.04 55.6 0.01 / 100 630
    10 4.20 0.26 41.2 0.21 0.10 0.07 0.09 56.2 0.02 / 101 200
    11 4.30 0.22 40.5 0.22 0.09 0.05 0.03 56.0 0.01 0.04 99.6 330
     注:“/”表示含量低于检测限。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   库木塔什萤石矿区磷灰石、方解石微量元素与稀土元素表(10−6

    Table  2   Trace element and rare earth element compositions (10−6) of apatite and calcite from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    样品号 Ap-01 Ap-02 Ap-03 Ap-04 Ap-05 Ap-06 Ap-07 Ap-08 Ap-09 Cal-01 Cal-02 Cal-03 Cal-04
    矿物 磷灰石 磷灰石 磷灰石 磷灰石 磷灰石 磷灰石 磷灰石 磷灰石 磷灰石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石
    Sc 0.26 0.16 0.2 0.22 0.15 0.17 0.2 0.14 0.12 0.36 0.37 0.42 0.28
    V 65.3 65.9 68.9 92.5 103 95.1 97 93.1 94.7 0.07 0.13 0.16 0.10
    Mn 130 118 287 126 135 111 104 104 111 1158 1187 1187 1182
    Fe 248 216 232 203 198 181 182 178 172 1535 1530 1541 1537
    Co 0.06 0.03 0.27 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.09
    Ga 0.29 0.22 1 0.17 0.13 0.16 0.1 0.13 0.11 0.42 0.34 0.23 0.22
    Rb 0 0.01 0 0.03 0 0.04 0.03 0 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.46
    Sr 834 888 891 810 708 713 715 699 676 1218 1228 1235 1221
    Y 103 124 118 85 58.1 74.4 78.1 75.4 57.4 36.6 36.8 36.2 35.0
    Sn 0.25 0.17 0.22 0.2 0.13 0.12 0.23 0.15 0.13 0.06 0.09 0.02 0.08
    Cs 0 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.00 0.01 0.10 0.08
    Ba 3.51 4 32.3 3.6 2.53 3.33 2.99 2.77 2.47 12.8 7.66 6.25 5.70
    La 309 366 343 223 159 194 209 205 150 34.3 41.1 14.1 9.87
    Ce 892 1016 949 625 453 540 570 561 428 102 113 57.4 46.5
    Pr 110 125 119 77.7 57.3 68.2 70.6 70 52.8 13.5 13.4 8.95 7.4
    Nd 394 450 434 270 205 241 250 243 189 50 50.2 37.7 33.5
    Sm 68.7 78.7 75.3 48.2 35 42.3 43.6 41.7 32.9 10.1 10.5 9 8.75
    Eu 6.63 7.72 7.44 5.01 4.07 4.29 4.56 4.43 3.54 1.05 1.07 1 1.02
    Gd 45.4 53.2 52.3 32.3 23.7 28 29.4 28 22.6 7.65 7.99 8.23 7.19
    Tb 5.55 6.39 6.19 3.99 2.94 3.59 3.6 3.53 2.91 1.13 1.17 1.09 1.1
    Dy 27.7 32.5 30.8 21.5 14.9 18.4 18.7 18.1 14.1 6.95 6.78 6.93 6.56
    Ho 4.35 5.22 4.98 3.49 2.48 2.91 3.02 2.94 2.45 1.4 1.42 1.35 1.32
    Er 11 12.8 12.2 8.34 6.21 7.66 7.81 7.49 5.93 4.08 4.19 4.07 4.17
    Tm 1.23 1.56 1.43 1.04 0.75 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.69 0.62 0.59 0.6 0.58
    Yb 6.88 8.32 7.32 5.59 3.96 4.62 4.84 4.95 3.74 4.33 4.27 4.31 4.2
    Lu 0.77 0.96 0.94 0.68 0.52 0.65 0.58 0.6 0.42 0.69 0.6 0.67 0.66
    W 0.05 0.06 0.33 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
    Bi 5.19 5.08 5.65 4.56 3.5 3.76 3.4 3.56 2.95 0.05 0.16 0.05 0.07
    Th 184 184 213 327 260 281 243 243 221 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
    U 25.7 24.3 27.5 31.7 18.4 22.4 17.1 17.2 15.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
    ΣREE 1883 2165 2043 1325 968 1157 1217 1191 908 238 256 155 133
    LREE 1780 2044 1927 1249 913 1090 1148 1124 856 211 229 128 107
    HREE 103 121 116 76.9 55.5 66.7 68.9 66.5 52.8 26.8 27 27.2 25.8
    LREE/HREE 17.3 16.9 16.6 16.2 16.5 16.3 16.7 16.9 16.2 7.87 8.48 4.7 4.16
    (La/Y)N 32.2 31.6 33.6 28.7 28.8 30.2 31 29.7 28.7 5.67 6.91 2.35 1.69
    δEu 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.41 0.36 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.38
    δCe 1.18 1.16 1.15 1.16 1.16 1.15 1.15 1.14 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.22 1.27
    样品号 Cal-05 Cal-06 Cal-07 Cal-08 Cal-09 Cal-10 Cal-11 Cal-12 Cal-13 Cal-14 Cal-15 Cal-16 Cal-17
    矿物 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石 方解石
    Sc 0.47 0.36 0.37 0.44 0.34 0.45 0.32 0.56 0.19 0.47 0.59 0.50 0.70
    V 0.07 0.14 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.20 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.13 1.79 0.18 0.20
    Mn 1176 1192 1372 1469 1423 1493 1389 1376 1058 1775 1800 2497 3858
    Fe 1556 1549 2695 3668 2559 4443 2475 2466 1169 1885 2636 2506 3710
    Co 0.01 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.07 0.09 0.21 0.09 0.14
    Ga 0.28 0.38 0.25 0.24 0.33 0.14 0.21 1.17 0.44 0.52 0.15 0.93 1.42
    Rb 0.39 0.10 0.22 0.04 0.04 0.23 0.13 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.42 0.14 0.25
    Sr 1187 1211 1110 1117 1125 1028 1146 1165 1047 1423 1049 2015 3011
    Y 36.0 35.2 40.3 38.4 40.0 50.6 43.0 42.4 30.4 40.0 47.0 61.9 99.8
    Sn 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.21 0.09 0.26
    Cs 0.14 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.04 0.10 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.07 0.08
    Ba 4.58 7.62 4.55 6.28 6.90 4.92 6.75 24.0 12.7 15.3 9.05 24.3 40.9
    La 13.4 30.6 28.5 29.3 43 12.9 99.4 94.6 44.5 29.4 29.9 83.8 259
    Ce 46.7 104 75.7 87.5 97.8 44.7 255 254 104 93.9 71.2 198 539
    Pr 6.74 12.9 9.65 11.3 11.7 7.29 29.2 29.2 12.2 12.6 11.3 23.8 57.7
    Nd 29.2 49.8 41.8 43.9 43.4 33.6 103 100 42.7 48.2 45.3 85 192
    Sm 8.66 9.87 9.49 9.21 9.56 10.2 16.3 14.8 8.75 10.7 10.4 17 29.7
    Eu 0.98 1.09 1.13 1.13 1.05 1.18 1.42 1.39 0.86 1.25 1.11 1.68 3.29
    Gd 6.6 8.04 8.38 8.47 8.45 9.8 10.2 10.1 6.49 8.26 8.62 13 21.1
    Tb 1.14 1.08 1.28 1.24 1.25 1.5 1.39 1.24 0.92 1.25 1.24 1.77 3.03
    Dy 6.63 6.53 7.72 7.68 7.84 9.91 8.18 8.16 5.28 7.3 7.96 11.7 17.4
    Ho 1.35 1.34 1.58 1.46 1.52 1.92 1.65 1.62 1.14 1.34 1.62 2.18 3.73
    Er 4.17 4.02 4.83 4.83 4.84 5.62 5.23 4.93 3.42 4.61 5 6.71 10.9
    Tm 0.61 0.62 0.75 0.68 0.69 0.79 0.75 0.71 0.47 0.66 0.85 0.99 1.49
    Yb 4.05 4.23 5.09 4.81 5 5.66 5.24 5.19 3.25 4.73 5.51 6.63 11.8
    Lu 0.67 0.63 0.79 0.74 0.82 0.78 0.91 0.82 0.51 0.75 0.9 1.09 1.67
    W 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.01
    Bi 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.18 0.40 0.29 0.38
    Th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.14 0.11 0.35 0.70
    U 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.37 0.02 0.60
    ΣREE 131 235 197 212 237 146 538 527 235 225 201 453 1152
    LREE 106 209 166 182 207 110 504 494 213 196 169 409 1081
    HREE 25.2 26.5 30.4 29.9 30.4 36 33.5 32.8 21.5 28.9 31.7 44 71.1
    LREE/HREE 4.19 7.87 5.47 6.1 6.79 3.05 15.1 15.1 9.93 6.78 5.33 9.29 15.2
    (La/Yb)N 2.37 5.19 4.01 4.37 6.16 1.63 13.6 13.1 9.83 4.45 3.88 9.06 15.7
    δEu 0.38 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.35 0.36 0.31 0.33 0.34 0.39 0.35 0.33 0.38
    δCe 1.2 1.29 1.12 1.18 1.05 1.11 1.15 1.18 1.08 1.2 0.95 1.07 1.04
     注:δEu=EuN/(SmN×GdN1/2; δCe=CeN/(LaN×PrN1/2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   库木塔什矿区磷灰石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb分析结果

    Table  3   LA-ICP-MS apatite U-Pb isotopic data from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    测点号 元素含量(10−6 U/Th 同位素比值
    U Th n(238U)/
    n(206Pb)
    n(207Pb)/
    n(206Pb)
    n(207Pb)/
    n(235U)
    n(206Pb)/
    n(238U)
    n(208Pb)/
    n(232Th)
    01 31.2 220 0.32 3.89 0.0530 0.4044 0.0069 14.16 0.1996 0.2572 0.0035 0.3304 0.0094
    02 36.7 258 0.31 4.47 0.0524 0.3835 0.0037 11.57 0.2336 0.2239 0.0026 0.2735 0.0064
    03 44.3 284 0.34 4.89 0.0572 0.3817 0.0042 10.53 0.1982 0.2045 0.0024 0.2740 0.0064
    04 47.3 300 0.31 5.11 0.0821 0.3622 0.0047 9.54 0.1923 0.1957 0.0031 0.2443 0.0051
    05 29.7 202 0.16 3.70 0.0656 0.4060 0.0065 15.23 0.2960 0.2702 0.0048 0.3171 0.0083
    06 29.9 212 0.16 3.44 0.0463 0.4171 0.0047 16.10 0.2191 0.2907 0.0039 0.3269 0.0085
    07 29.1 198 0.16 3.47 0.0453 0.4134 0.0054 15.83 0.2357 0.2883 0.0038 0.3328 0.0069
    08 30.8 214 0.16 3.65 0.0493 0.4119 0.0051 15.01 0.2139 0.2743 0.0037 0.3207 0.0083
    09 32.0 225 0.15 3.69 0.0430 0.4134 0.0050 15.01 0.2086 0.2709 0.0032 0.3131 0.0096
    10 31.8 217 0.16 3.69 0.0549 0.4207 0.0055 15.25 0.2204 0.2711 0.0040 0.3245 0.0073
    11 36.7 255 0.16 4.06 0.0766 0.4008 0.0061 13.24 0.1785 0.2460 0.0046 0.2912 0.0077
    12 35.8 247 0.16 4.03 0.0700 0.4063 0.0062 13.56 0.2164 0.2480 0.0043 0.2894 0.0084
    13 35.1 240 0.16 4.03 0.0569 0.4098 0.0068 13.71 0.1863 0.2482 0.0035 0.2950 0.0087
    14 36.3 250 0.16 4.05 0.0725 0.4123 0.0064 13.68 0.2371 0.2468 0.0044 0.2880 0.0083
    15 54.4 331 0.26 5.83 0.1343 0.3344 0.0050 7.48 0.2133 0.1715 0.0040 0.2344 0.0060
    16 57.3 345 0.25 5.72 0.0905 0.3442 0.0060 7.77 0.1164 0.1748 0.0028 0.2417 0.0063
    17 51.6 323 0.35 6.29 0.1334 0.2775 0.0040 5.95 0.1339 0.1591 0.0034 0.2336 0.0068
    18 52.4 322 0.34 6.20 0.1610 0.2811 0.0058 6.09 0.1674 0.1612 0.0042 0.2320 0.0078
    19 53.0 329 0.29 5.92 0.1796 0.3070 0.0050 6.76 0.2174 0.1688 0.0051 0.2353 0.0081
    20 55.3 339 0.23 5.43 0.0730 0.3645 0.0049 8.58 0.1444 0.1842 0.0025 0.2484 0.0073
    21 53.7 328 0.27 5.78 0.1402 0.3228 0.0057 7.21 0.1931 0.1731 0.0042 0.2433 0.0083
    22 48.8 309 0.39 6.32 0.1086 0.2587 0.0038 5.61 0.1081 0.1582 0.0027 0.2325 0.0071
    23 50.6 319 0.37 6.24 0.1206 0.2646 0.0040 5.80 0.1216 0.1604 0.0031 0.2315 0.0064
    24 56.2 347 0.21 5.19 0.1003 0.3873 0.0058 9.57 0.1592 0.1928 0.0037 0.2533 0.0056
    25 42.9 308 0.27 4.16 0.0680 0.5004 0.0070 16.28 0.2830 0.2404 0.0039 0.2926 0.0072
    26 50.1 358 0.23 5.07 0.0826 0.3905 0.0054 10.31 0.1208 0.1974 0.0032 0.2444 0.0056
    27 36.4 289 0.27 4.08 0.0488 0.4882 0.0049 15.99 0.2317 0.2448 0.0029 0.2952 0.0062
    28 37.1 362 0.27 6.03 0.0983 0.2567 0.0044 5.95 0.1040 0.1658 0.0027 0.1837 0.0058
    29 29.9 235 0.26 3.70 0.0550 0.5267 0.0075 18.96 0.3393 0.2702 0.0040 0.3157 0.0072
    30 43.8 457 0.17 4.80 0.0598 0.3948 0.0054 10.93 0.1380 0.2084 0.0026 0.2053 0.0047
    31 43.5 256 0.41 5.34 0.0705 0.2731 0.0034 6.79 0.0948 0.1873 0.0025 0.2880 0.0066
    32 59.1 332 0.44 7.78 0.1007 0.2113 0.0026 3.62 0.0450 0.1286 0.0017 0.2061 0.0059
    33 74.5 493 0.34 8.32 0.0930 0.1960 0.0025 3.36 0.0691 0.1201 0.0013 0.1669 0.0038
    34 47.2 280 0.28 5.83 0.0945 0.2570 0.0036 6.07 0.0985 0.1716 0.0028 0.2374 0.0075
    35 48.6 285 0.42 6.75 0.0910 0.2251 0.0034 4.42 0.0579 0.1482 0.0020 0.2208 0.0048
    36 65.1 384 0.34 7.11 0.0759 0.2165 0.0025 4.31 0.0591 0.1407 0.0015 0.2062 0.0044
    37 39.3 340 0.22 6.55 0.0959 0.2264 0.0033 4.90 0.0826 0.1527 0.0022 0.1736 0.0037
    38 63.5 328 0.49 8.18 0.0948 0.1847 0.0027 3.09 0.0409 0.1223 0.0014 0.2061 0.0052
    39 52.4 336 0.39 7.99 0.1200 0.1875 0.0023 3.23 0.0408 0.1251 0.0019 0.1921 0.0042
    40 51.6 340 0.38 7.97 0.1127 0.1804 0.0025 3.13 0.0404 0.1255 0.0018 0.1867 0.0051
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   库木塔什磷灰石原位Sr-Nd同位素分析结果

    Table  4   Sr and Nd isotopic results from the Kumutashi fluorite deposit

    样号 87Rb/86Sr 87Sr/86Sr 147Sm/144Nd 143Nd/144Nd εNd(t
    01 0.000058 0.70933 0.10390 0.51149 −11.1
    02 0.000004 0.70973 0.10454 0.51151 −10.6
    03 0.000058 0.70943 0.10273 0.51151 −10.7
    04 0.000058 0.70947 0.09928 0.51141 −12.7
    05 0.000058 0.70960 0.10504 0.51143 −12.1
    06 0.000058 0.70948 0.10259 0.51140 −12.8
    07 0.000058 0.71047 0.10482 0.51149 −11.1
    08 0.000058 0.70938 0.10411 0.51151 −10.7
    09 0.000040 0.70949 0.10202 0.51153 −10.3
    10 0.000014 0.70965 0.10394 0.51152 −10.4
    11 0.000111 0.70916 0.10724 0.51145 −11.8
    12 0.000014 0.70928 0.10426 0.51138 −13.3
    13 0.000144 0.70913 0.10444 0.51145 −11.9
    14 0.000140 0.70921 0.10245 0.51138 −13.2
    15 0.000015 0.70915 0.10371 0.51149 −11.0
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 曹玉亭, 刘良, 王超, 等. 阿尔金南缘塔特勒克布拉克花岗岩的地球化学特征、锆石U-Pb定年及Hf同位素组成[J]. 岩石学报, 2010, 26(11): 3259−3271.

    CAO Yuting, LIU Liang, WANG Chao, et al. Geochemical, Zircon U-Pb Dating and Hf Isotope Compositions Studies for Tatelekebulake Granite in South Altyn Tagh[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2010,26(11):3259−3271.

    陈宁, 曾忠诚, 赵端昌, 等. 阿尔金造山带南缘晚奥陶世碱性辉长岩成因及其大地构造意义[J]. 西北地质, 2023, 56(4): 91−102.

    CHEN Ning, ZENG Zhongcheng, ZHAO Duanchang, et al. Petrogenesis and Tectonic Implications of Late Ordovician Alkaline Gabbro in the South Altyn Orogenic Belt[J]. Northwestern Geology,2023,56(4):91−102.

    高永宝, 赵辛敏, 王博, 等. 阿尔金西段卡尔恰尔-库木塔什超大型萤石矿带矿床地质、控矿花岗岩特征及找矿远景[J]. 中国地质, 2023, 50(3): 704−729.

    GAO Yongbao, ZHAO Xinmin, WANG Bo, et al. Geological characteristics, associated granites and the prospecting potential of the super-large Kaerqiaer-Kumutashi fluorite mineralization belt in theWest Altyn-Tagh Orogen, NW China[J]. Geology in China,2023,50(3):704−729.

    段星星, 张越, 袁彦伟, 等. 阿尔金南缘清水泉堆晶岩年代学、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 西北地质, 2023, 56(4): 103−115.

    DUAN Xingxing, ZHANG Yue, YUAN Yanwei, et al. Geochronology, Geochemistry and Geological Significance of Cumulates in Qingshuiquan Region, South Altyn Tagh[J]. Northwestern Geology,2023,56(4):103−115.

    何元方, 张振凯, 高峰, 等. 阿尔金索尔库里地区石英闪长玢岩锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 西北地质, 2018, 51(3): 38−52.

    HE Yuanfang, ZHANG Zhenkai, GAO Feng, et al. Zircon U-Pb Ages and Geochemical Characteristics of Quartz Diorite Porphyrite from Suoerkuli Area in Altyn Tagh and their Geological Significance[J]. Northwestern Geology,2018,51(3):38−52.

    康磊, 刘良, 曹玉亭, 等. 阿尔金南缘塔特勒克布拉克复式花岗质岩体东段片麻状花岗岩的地球化学特征、锆石U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(9): 3039−3048.

    KANG Lei, LIU Liang, CAO Yuting, et al. Geochemistry, zircon U-Pb age and its geological significance of the gneissic granite from the eastern segment of the Tatelekebulake composite granite in the south Altyn Tagh[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2013,29(9):3039−3048.

    李杭, 洪涛, 杨智全, 等. 稀有金属花岗伟晶岩锆石、锡石与铌钽铁矿U-Pb和白云母40Ar/39Ar测年对比研究-以阿尔金中段吐格曼北锂铍矿床为例[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(9): 2869−2892. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2020.09.16

    LI Hang, HONG Tao, YANG Zhiquan, et al. Comparative studying on zircon, cassiterite and coltan U-Pb dating and 40Ar/39Ar dating of muscovite rare-metal granitic pegmatites: A case study of the northern Tugeman lithium-beryllium deposit in the middle of Altyn Tagh[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2020,36(9):2869−2892. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2020.09.16

    李杭, 洪涛, 杨智全, 等. 阿尔金中段吐格曼北花岗伟晶岩型锂铍矿床多阶段岩浆-成矿作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2022, 38(10): 3085−3103.

    LI Hang, HONG Tao, YANG Zhiquan, et al. Multi-stage magmatism-mineralization and tectonic setting of the North Tugeman granitic pegmatite lithium-beryllium deposit in the middle of Altyn Tagh[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2022,38(10):3085−3103.

    刘良, 张安达, 陈丹玲, 等. 阿尔金江尕勒萨依榴辉岩和围岩锆石LA-ICP-MS微区原位定年及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2007, 14(1): 98−107. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5791(07)60004-9

    LIU Liang, ZHANG Anda, CHEN Danling, et al. Implication based on LA-ICP-MS ages of eclogite and its country rock from Jiang galesayi area, Altyn Tagh[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2007,14(1):98−107. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5791(07)60004-9

    刘良, 康磊, 曹玉亭, 等. 南阿尔金早古生代俯冲碰撞过程中的花岗质岩浆作用[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2015, 58(8): 1513−1522.

    LIU Liang,KANG Lei,CAO Yuting,et al. Early Paleozoic granitic magmatism related to the processes from subduction to collision in South Altyn,NW China[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences,2015,58(8):1513−1522.

    刘亚非, 王立社, 魏小燕, 等. 应用电子微探针-扫描电镜-拉曼光谱-电子背散射衍射研究一种未知Ti-Zr-U氧化物的矿物学特征[J]. 岩矿测试, 2016, 35(1): 48−55.

    LIU Yafei, WANG Lishe, WEI Xiaoyan, et al. Study on the mineralogical properties of an unknown Ti-Zr-U oxide using EPMA, SEM, Raman Spectroscopy and EBSD techniques[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis,2016,35(1):48−55.

    马中平, 李向民, 徐学义, 等. 南阿尔金山清水泉镁铁-超镁铁质侵入体LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb同位素定年及其意义[J]. 中国地质, 2011, 38(4): 1071−1078.

    MA Zhongping, LI Xiangmin, XU Xueyi, et al. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb isotopic dating for Qingshuiquan layered mafic ulmafic intrusion southern Altun orogen, in northwestern China and its implication[J]. Geology in China,2011,38(4):1071−1078.

    孙丰月, 石准立. 试论幔源C-H-O流体与大陆板内某些地质作用[J]. 地学前缘, 1995, 2(1−2): 167−174.

    SUN Fengyue, SHI Zhunli. On the mantle-derived C-H-O fluid system and its significance to some geologic processes within continental plate[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,1995,2(1−2):167−174.

    谭侯铭睿, 黄小文, 漆亮, 等. 磷灰石化学组成研究进展: 成岩成矿过程示踪及对矿产勘查的指示[J]. 岩石学报, 2022, 38(10): 3067−3084. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2022.10.11

    TAN Houminrui, HUANG Xiaowen, QI Liang, et al. Research progress on chemical composition of apatite: Application in petrogenesis, ore genesis and mineral exploration[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2022,38(10):3067−3084. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2022.10.11

    王核, 马华东, 张嵩, 等. 新疆阿尔金地区黄龙岭超大型伟晶岩型锂矿床的发现及找矿意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2023, 39(11): 3307−3318. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2023.11.06

    WANG He, MA Huadong, ZHANG Song, et al. Discovery of the Huanglongling giant lithium pegmatite deposit in Altyn Tagh, Xinjiang, China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2023,39(11):3307−3318. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2023.11.06

    王立社, 杨鹏飞, 段星星, 等. 阿尔金南缘中段清水泉斜长花岗岩同位素年龄及成因研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(3): 759−774.

    WANG Lishe, YANG Pengfei, DUAN Xingxing, et al. Isotopic age and genesis of plagiogranite from Qingshuiquan area in the middle of South Altyn Tagh[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2016,32(3):759−774.

    吴益平, 张连昌, 袁波, 等. 新疆阿尔金地区卡尔恰尔超大型萤石矿床地质特征及成因[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2021, 43(6): 962−977.

    WU Yiping, ZHANG Lianchang, YUAN Bo, et al. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of the Super-large Kalqiar Fluorite Deposit in Altyn Tagh Area of Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2021,43(6):962−977.

    吴益平, 张连昌, 周月斌, 等. 阿尔金卡尔恰尔超大型萤石矿床成矿流体特征及形成机制探讨[J]. 地质科学, 2022, 57(2): 495−509.

    WU Yiping, ZHANG Lianchang, ZHOU Yuebin, et al. Study on fluid characteristic and metallogenic mechanism of the super-large Kalqiaer fluorite deposit in Altyn Tagh area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology,2022,57(2):495−509.

    邢凯, 舒启海. 磷灰石在矿床学研究中的应用[J]. 矿床地质, 2021, 40(02): 189−205.

    XING Kai, SHU QiHai. Applications of apatite in study of ore deposits: A review[J]. Mineral Deposits,2021,40(02):189−205.

    徐兴旺, 李杭, 石福品, 等. 阿尔金中段吐格曼地区花岗伟晶岩型稀有金属成矿特征与找矿预测[J]. 岩石学报, 2019, 35(11): 3303−3316. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2019.11.03

    XU Xingwang, LI Hang, SHI Fupin, et al. Metallogenic characteristics and prospecting of granitic pegmatite-type rare metal deposits in the Tugeman area, middle part of Altyn Tagh[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2019,35(11):3303−3316. doi: 10.18654/1000-0569/2019.11.03

    许志琴, 杨经绥, 嵇少丞, 等. 中国大陆构造及动力学若干问题的认识[J]. 地质学报, 2010, 84(1): 1−29. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2010.00164.x

    XU Zhiqin, YANG Jingsui, JI Shaocheng, et al. On the Continental Tectonics and Dynamics of China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2010,84(1):1−29. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2010.00164.x

    赵辛敏, 高永宝, 燕洲泉, 等. 阿尔金卡尔恰尔超大型萤石矿带成因: 来自年代学、稀土元素和Sr-Nd同位素的约束[J]. 西北地质, 2023, 56(1): 31−47.

    ZHAO Xinmin, GAO Yongbao, YAN Zhouquan, et al. Genesis of Kalqiaer Super–large Fluorite Zone in Altyn Tagh Area: Chronology, Rare Earth Elements and Sr–Nd Isotopes Constraints[J]. Northwestern Geology,2023,56(1):31−47.

    赵振华. 副矿物微量元素地球化学特征在成岩成矿作用研究中的应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(1): 267−286.

    ZHAO Zhenhua. Trace element geochemistry of accessory minerals and its applications in petrogenesis and metallogenesis[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2010,17(1):267−286.

    喻学惠. 地幔交代作用: 研究进展、问题及对策[J]. 地球科学进展, 1995, 10(4): 330−335.

    YU Xuehui. Mantle metasomatism: progresses, problems and countermeasure[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences,1995,10(4):330−335.

    张若愚, 曾忠诚, 朱伟鹏, 等. 阿尔金造山带帕夏拉依档岩体锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 地质论评, 2016, 62(5): 1283−1299.

    ZHANG Ruoyu, ZENG Zhongcheng, ZHU Weipeng, et al. LA-ICP-MS Zircon U-Pb Dating, Geochemical Features and Their Geological Implications of Paxialayidang Plutons on the Southern Margin of Altyn Tagh[J]. Geological Review,2016,62(5):1283−1299.

    张若愚, 曾忠诚, 陈宁, 等. 阿尔金造山带南缘中-晚奥陶世正长花岗岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2018, 37(4): 545−558.

    ZHANG Ruoyu, ZENG Zhongcheng, CHEN Ning, et al. The discovery of Middle-Late Ordovician syenogranite on thesouthern margin of Altun orogenic belt and its geological significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China,2018,37(4):545−558.

    周敖日格勒, 王英, 唐菊兴, 等. 冈底斯斑岩铜矿带东段早中新世剥蚀作用及对渐新世—中新世斑岩矿床时空分布的影响[J]. 西北地质, 2022, 55(3): 286−296.

    ZHOU Aorigele, WANG Ying, TANG Juxing, et al. Early Miocene Exhumation History in the Eastern Gangdese Porphyry Copper Belt and Its Influence on the Spatiotemporal Distribution of Oligocene-Miocene Porphyry Deposits[J]. Northwestern Geology,2022,55(3):286−296.

    Amelin Y, Valeyev O. Nd-Pb-Sr isotope systematics of crustal assimilation in the Voisey's Bay and Mushuau intrusions, Labrador, Canadap[J]. Economic Geology,2000,95(4):815−830.

    Bao B, Webster J D, Zhang D H, et al. Compositions of biotite, amphibole, apatite and silicate melt inclusions from the Tongchang mine, Dexing porphyry deposit, SE China: Implications for the behavior of halogens in mineralized porphyry systems[J]. Ore Geology Reviews,2016,79:443−462. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.05.024

    Belousova E A, Walters S, Griffin W L, et al. Traceelement signatures of apatites in granitoids from the Mt Isa Inlier, northwestern Queensland[J]. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences,2001,48(4):603−619. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-0952.2001.00879.x

    Belousova E A, Griffin W L, O'Reilly S Y, et al. Apatite as an indicator mineral for mineral exploration: trace-element composition and their relationship to host rock type[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2002,76(1):45−69. doi: 10.1016/S0375-6742(02)00204-2

    Cao M J, Li G M, Qin K Z, et al. Major and trace element characteristics of apatites in granitoids from central Kazakhstan: Implications for petrogenesis and mineralization[J]. Resource Geology,2012,62(1):63−83. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-3928.2011.00180.x

    Brehler B. Chlorine[J]. Handbook of Geochemistry,1974,2:17A−17O.

    Chelle-Michou C, Chiaradia M. Amphibole and apatite in-sights into the evolution and mass balance of Cl and S in magmas associated with porphyry copper deposits[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology,2017,172:105. doi: 10.1007/s00410-017-1417-2

    Chen B, Ma X, Wang Z, et al. Origin of the fluorine-rich highly differentiated granites from the Qianlishan composite plutons (South China) and implications for polymetallic mineralization[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2014,93:301−314. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.07.022

    Creaser R A, Gray C M. Preserved initial 87Sr/86Sr in apatite from altered felsic igneous rocks: A case study from the Middle Proterozoic of South Australia[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1992,56(7):2789−2795. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(92)90359-Q

    Ding T, Ma D S, Lu J J, et al. Apatite in granitoids related to polymetallic mineral deposits in southeastern Hunan Province Shi-Hang zone, China: Implications for petrogenesis and metallogenesis[J]. Ore Geology Reviews,2015,69:104−117. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.02.004

    Fan J J, Tang G J, Wei G J, et al. Lithium isotope fractionation during fluid exsolution: Implications for Li mineralization of the Bailongshan pegmatites in the West Kunlun, NW Tibet[J]. Lithos,2020,352−353:105236. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.105236

    Farver J R, Giletti B J. Oxygen and strontium diffusion kinetics in apatite and potential applications to thermal history determina tions[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1989,53(7):1621−1631. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90243-3

    Gao Y B, Zhao X M, Bagas L, et al. Newly discovered Ordovician Li-Be deposits at Tugeman in the Altyn-Tagh Orogen, NW China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews,2021,139:104515. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104515

    Gehrels G E, Yin A, Wang X F. Magmatic history of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,2003,108(B9):1−14.

    Hovis G L, Harlov D E. Solution calorimetric investigation of fluorchlorapatite crystalline solutions[J]. American Mineralogist,2010,95(7):946−952. doi: 10.2138/am.2010.3485

    Hughes J M, Rakovan J. Structurally Robust, Chemically Diverse: Apatite and Apatite Supergroup Minerals[J]. Elements,2015,11(3):165−170. doi: 10.2113/gselements.11.3.165

    Liu L, Wang C, Chen D L, et a1. Petrology And geochronology of HP-UHP rocks from the South Altyn Tagh, northwestern China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2009,35(3−4):232−244. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.10.007

    Liu L, Wang C, Cao Y T, et al. Geochronology of multi-stage metamorphic events: constraints on episodic zircon growth from the UHP eclogite in the South Altun, NW China[J]. Lithos,2012,136-139:10−26. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2011.09.014

    Liu M Y, Zhou M F, Su S G, et al. Contrasting Ggeochemistry of Aapatite from Pperidotites and Ssulfide Oores of the Jinchuan Ni-Cu Ssulfide Ddeposit, NW China[J]. Economic Geology,2021,116(5):1073−1092. doi: 10.5382/econgeo.4817

    Long X P, Sun M, Yuan C, et al. Zircon REE patterns and geochemical characteristics of Paleoproterozoic anatectic granite in the northern Tarim Craton, NW China: implications for the reconstruction of the Columbia supercontinent[J]. Precambrian Research,2012(222−223):474−487.

    London D, Kontak D J. Granitic pegmatites: Scientific wonders and economic bonanzas[J]. Elements,2012,8(4):257−261. doi: 10.2113/gselements.8.4.257

    Ludwig, K R. User’s manual for Isoplot 3.00: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel[J]. Berkeley Geochronology CenterSpecial Publication,2003(4):1−70.

    Macdonald R, Bagiński B, Dzierz anowski P, et al. Apatite-supergroup minerals in UK Palaeogene granites: Composition and relationship to host-rock composition[J]. European Journal of Mineralogy,2013,25(3):461−471. doi: 10.1127/0935-1221/2013/0025-2291

    Mathez E A, Webster J D. Partitioning behavior of chlorine and fluorine in the system apatite-silicate melt-fluid[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2005,69(5):1275−1286. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.08.035

    Mao M, Rukhlov A S, Rowins S M, et al. Apatite trace element compositions: A robust new tool for mineral exploration[J]. Economic Geology,2016,111:1187−1222. doi: 10.2113/econgeo.111.5.1187

    McFarlane C R M, McCulloch M T. Coupling of in-situ Sm-Nd systematics and U-Pb dating of monazite and allanite with applications to crustal evolution studies[J]. Chemical Geology,2007,245(1−2):45−60.

    Miles A J, Graham C M, Hawkesworth C J, et al. Apatite: A new redox proxy for silicic magmas?[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2014,132:101−119. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.040

    Naylor R S, Steiger R H, Wasserburg G J. U-Th-Pb and Rb-Sr systematics in 2700×106 year old plutons from the southern Wind River Range, Wyoming[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1970,34(11):1133−1159. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(70)90055-4

    Parat F, Holtz F, Klügel A. S-rich apatite-hosted glass inclusions in xenoliths from La Palma: constraints on the volatile partitioning in evolved alkaline magmas[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology,2011,162:463−478. doi: 10.1007/s00410-011-0606-7

    Piccoli P M, Candela P A. Apatite in igneous systems[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry,2002,48(1):255−292. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2002.48.6

    Prowatke S, Klemme S. Trace element partitioning between apatite and silicate melts[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2006,70(17):4513−4527. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.06.162

    Qu P, Li N B, Niu H C, et al. Zircon and apatite as tools to monitor the evolution of fractionated I-type granites from the central Great Xing’an Range, NE China[J]. Lithos,2019,348:105207.

    Ramos F C, Wolff J A, Tollstrup D L. Measuring 87Sr/86Sr variations in minerals and groundmass from basalts using LA-MC-ICP-MS[J]. Chemical Geology,2004,211(1−2):135−158. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.025

    Richards J P, López G P, Zhu J J, et al. Contrasting Tectonic Settings and Sulfur Contents of Magmas Associated with Cretaceous Porphyry Cu ± Mo ± Au and Intrusion-Related Iron Oxide Cu-Au Deposits in Northern Chile[J]. Economic Geology,2017,122(2):295−318.

    Sha L K, Chappell B W. Apitate chemical composition, determined by electron microprobe and laser-ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, as a probe into granite petrogenesis[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1999,63(22):3861−3881. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00210-0

    Sun S J, Yang X Y, Wang G J, et al. In situ elemental and Sr-O isotopic studies on apatite from the Xu-Huai intrusion at the southern margin of the North China Craton: implications for petrogenesis and metallogeny[J]. Chemical Geology,2019,510:200−214. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.02.010

    Teiber H, Marks M A W, Wenzel T, et al. The distribution of halogens(F, Cl, Br)in granitoid rocks[J]. Chemical Geology,2014,374:92−109.

    Thomas R, Webster J D. Strong tin enrichment in a pegmatite forming melt[J]. Mineralium Deposita,2000,35(6):570−582. doi: 10.1007/s001260050262

    Treloar P J, Colley H. Variations in F and Cl contents in apatites from magnetite-apatite ores in northern Chile, and their ore-genetic implications[J]. Mineralogical Magazine,1996,60(2):285−301.

    Wang C, Liu L, Yang W Q, et al. Provenance and ages of the Altyn complex in Altyn Tagh: Implications for the Early Neoproterozoic evolution of northwestern China[J]. Precambrian Research,2013,230:193−208. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2013.02.003

    Wang C, Liu L, Xiao PX, et al. Geochemical and geochronologic constraints for Paleozoic magmatism related to the orogenic collapse in the Qimantagh-South Altyn region, northwestern China[J]. Lithos,2014,202-203:1−20. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.05.016

    Wang C, Peng P, Wang X P, et al. Nature of three Proterozoic ( 1680 Ma, 1230 Ma and 775 Ma) mafic dyke swarms in North China: Implications for tectonic evolution and paleogeographic reconstruction[J]. Precambrian Research,2016,285:109−126. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2016.09.015

    Webster J D, Kinzler R J, Mathez E A. Chloride and water solubility in basalt and andesite melts and implications for magmatic degassing[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1999,63(5):729−738. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00043-5

    Webster J D, Vivo B D. Experimental and modeled solubilities of chlorine in aluminosilicate melts, consequences of magma evolution, and implications for exsolution of hydrous chloride melt at Mt. Somma-Vesuvius[J]. American Mineralogist,2002,87(8-9):1046−1061. doi: 10.2138/am-2002-8-902

    Xing K, Shu Q H, Lentz D R, et al. Zircon and apatite geochemical constraints on the formation of the Huojihe porphyry Mo deposit in the Lesser Xing’an Range, NE China[J]. American Mineralogist,2020,105(3):382−396.

    Xu Z Q, He B Z, Zhang C L, et al. Tectonic framework and crustal evolution of the Precambrian basement of the Tarim Block in NW China: New geochronological evidence from deep drilling samples[J]. Precambrian Research,2013,235:150−162. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2013.06.001

    Yang Y H, Wu FY, Yang J H, et al. Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of apatite reference materials used in U-Th-Pb geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology,2014,385(14):35−55.

    Yu S Y, Zhang J X, Del Real P G, et al. The Grenvillian orogeny in the Altun-Qilian-North Qaidam mountain belts of northern Tibet Plateau: constraints from geochemical and zircon U-Pb age and Hf isotopic study of magmatic rocks[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2013,73:372−395. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.04.042

    Zhang J X, Zhang Z M, Xu Z Q, et al. Petrology and geochronology of eclogites from the Western segment of the Altyn Tagh, north western China[J]. Lithos,2001,56(2−3):187−206. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(00)00052-9

    Yu J, Zheng D, Pang J, et al. Miocene range growth along the Altyn Tagh Fault: Insights from apatite fission track and (U-Th)/He thermochronometry in the western Danghenan Shan, China[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,2019,124(8):9433−9453.

    Zhao J X, Qin K Z, Evans N J, et al. Volatile components and magma-metal sources at the Sharang porphyry Mo deposit. Tibet[J]. Ore Geology Reviews,2020,126:103779. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103779

    Zhou R J, Wen G, Li J W, et al. Apatite chemistry as a petrogenetic-metallogenic indicator for skarn ore-related granitoids: an example from the Daye Fe-Cu-(Au-Mo-W) district, Eastern China[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology,2022,177:23. doi: 10.1007/s00410-022-01890-0

  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 秦志军,汪兴韦,周豹,刘嘉,杜文洋,曾小华,李奥冰,张维康. 大别造山带双庙关金矿床成矿时代与成矿背景. 西北地质. 2024(01): 207-218 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(0)

图(10)  /  表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  0
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 1
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-02-20
  • 修回日期:  2024-03-27
  • 录用日期:  2024-03-27
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-04-09
  • 刊出日期:  2024-08-19

目录

/

返回文章
返回