Geochemical Characteristics and Provenance Analysis of Middle Jurassic Xintiangou Formation in Dijiang-Changshou Area
-
摘要:
笔者以川东地区垫江-长寿一带新田沟组为研究对象,旨在研究新田沟组碎屑岩物质来源及源区构造环境,为进一步研究四川盆地东部侏罗系湖盆演化提供依据。笔者在垫江县和长寿区各测制1条剖面,了解了新田沟组岩性特征和沉积环境,并在两条剖面上采集了28件地球化学样品,所有样品均进行全岩主量、微量和稀土元素分析测试。其中,Al2O3/TiO2值和La/Th-Hf图解、Co/Th-La/Sc图解均指示源岩为长英质岩石、安山质岩石和古老沉积物。稀土元素La、Lan/Ybn、ΣLREE/ΣhREE值、La/Y—Sc/Cr图解;主量元素TFe2O3+ MgO、SiO2/Al2O3、K2O/Na2O等的平均值、 K2O/Na2O-SiO2判别图解;微量元素Sc/Cr、Zr/Hf等比值和Th-Co-Zr/10、La-Th-Sc、Th-Sc-Zr/10等构造环境判别图解,显示源区构造环境为大陆岛弧和被动大陆边缘。结合前人研究成果,可知研究区新田沟组物质来源于南秦岭-大巴山地区,物源主要为长英质岩石、安山质岩石和古老沉积物;物源区构造背景为南秦岭大巴山不同构造阶段的大陆岛弧环境和被动大陆边缘。
Abstract:This paper takes the Xintiangou Formation in Dianjiang-Changshou area of eastern Sichuan as the research object, aiming at studying the source of clastic rocks and the tectonic environment of the source area in Xintiangou Formation, and provides a basis for further study of Jurassic lake basin evolution in eastern Sichuan Basin. In this paper, one profile of Xintiangou Formation was measured in Dianjiang County and Changshou District, respectively, understanding the lithologic characteristics and sedimentary environment of Xintiangou Formation.28 geochemical samples were collected from 2 sections, and all samples were analyzed for major, trace and rare earth elements. Among them, Al2O3/TiO2, La/Th-Hf and Co/Th-La/Sc diagrams indicate that the source rocks are felsic, andesitic and ancient sediments. Rare earth elements La, Lan/Ybn, ΣLREE/ΣhREE value, La/Y-Sc/Cr diagram, and main elements TFe2O3+MgO, SiO2/Al2O3, K2O/Na2O, et a1 average, K2O/Na2O-SiO2 discriminant diagram, and the discrimination diagrams of Sc/Cr values, Zr/Hf values, et a1 and Th-Co-Zr/10, La-Th-Sc, Th-Sc-Zr/10 tectonic environment shows that tectonic setting of source area is continental island arc and passive continental margin.Combined with previous research results, it can be seen that the material of Xintiangou Formation in the study area comes from the South Qinling-Daba Mountains area, and the materials are mainly felsic rocks, andesitic rocks and ancient sediments. The tectonic setting of the provenance area is the continental island arc environment and passive continental margin of different tectonic stages of the South Qinling-Daba Mountains area.
-
Keywords:
- Xintiangou Formation /
- geochemical characteristics /
- provenance /
- tectonic setting
-
-
表 1 研究区新田沟组碎屑岩主量元素含量(%)与化学风化指标统计表
Table 1 Statistical table of major element content (%) and chemical weathering index of clastic rock of Xintiangou Formation in study area
样品编号 岩性 SiO2 Al2O3 TiO2 TFe2O3 MnO MgO CaO Na2O K2O P2O5 LOI CIA ICV CIW PIA XG01-1 页岩 60.14 18.35 0.89 7.10 0.04 2.22 0.63 0.95 2.68 0.13 6.86 77.63 0.62 88.49 86.62 XG01-2 页岩 61.81 16.36 0.80 7.03 0.07 2.31 1.13 1.23 2.18 0.17 6.74 73.08 0.75 81.69 79.25 XG01-3 页岩 60.01 18.59 0.88 6.54 0.03 1.77 0.62 0.67 3.16 0.13 7.59 77.70 0.60 90.66 88.79 XG01-4 页岩 57.82 19.89 0.81 5.67 0.02 1.80 0.60 0.54 3.69 0.17 8.96 78.08 0.54 92.60 90.92 XG01-5 泥岩 60.34 18.00 0.89 6.54 0.04 1.76 0.63 1.39 2.86 0.22 7.01 75.02 0.67 86.14 83.72 XG01-6 砂岩 73.47 12.52 0.83 3.90 0.05 1.03 0.63 2.29 1.50 0.19 3.58 67.33 0.82 73.77 71.00 XG01-7 砂岩 62.22 13.06 0.40 3.68 0.26 1.21 6.74 2.23 2.14 0.11 7.81 57.52 1.70 64.05 59.44 XG01-8 泥岩 64.23 16.04 0.74 6.14 0.03 1.94 0.55 1.12 3.18 0.12 5.88 72.74 0.70 86.20 83.06 XG01-9 泥岩 59.52 16.59 0.77 7.12 0.06 2.55 1.85 1.62 2.93 0.22 6.59 66.15 0.90 75.73 71.62 XG01-10 砂岩 73.13 12.44 0.59 4.12 0.04 1.23 0.58 2.11 1.74 0.16 3.85 67.35 0.80 74.99 71.79 XG01-11 砂岩 75.34 11.41 0.52 3.27 0.04 1.03 0.81 2.53 1.85 0.12 3.08 60.79 0.92 68.05 63.72 XG01-12 粉砂岩 63.88 16.42 0.87 5.68 0.06 2.07 1.00 1.93 3.14 0.16 4.77 67.18 0.81 78.03 73.79 XG01-13 砂岩 72.32 12.35 0.57 4.41 0.06 1.38 0.87 2.51 2.10 0.15 3.12 61.81 0.95 69.74 65.28 XG01-14 砂岩 74.35 11.51 0.87 3.52 0.60 0.82 0.48 1.88 2.03 0.17 3.75 66.63 1.04 76.33 72.30 XG01-15 粉砂岩 46.79 15.63 0.64 6.22 0.12 1.90 9.95 0.40 3.47 0.12 14.75 75.50 1.78 92.23 90.02 XG01-16 砂岩 63.21 10.19 0.30 3.46 0.20 0.92 8.90 2.22 1.97 0.43 8.05 51.89 2.49 58.20 52.41 XG01-17 泥岩 59.06 18.30 0.75 6.38 0.05 2.48 0.86 1.45 3.56 0.17 6.75 71.26 0.71 83.84 80.38 TM02-1 砂岩 72.48 10.18 0.47 8.44 0.03 1.24 0.65 1.31 0.84 0.10 4.27 71.77 1.01 76.70 74.98 TM02-2 页岩 57.07 20.59 0.97 7.20 0.05 2.55 0.66 0.78 3.53 0.19 6.39 77.86 0.60 91.01 89.18 TM02-3 粉砂岩 64.69 16.42 0.81 5.73 0.06 1.48 0.80 1.40 2.20 0.21 6.18 74.45 0.67 83.46 81.19 TM02-4 砂岩 68.14 12.47 0.59 4.08 0.29 1.07 3.51 2.20 1.65 0.14 5.86 58.06 1.31 63.33 59.67 TM02-5 泥岩 57.88 19.54 0.85 7.10 0.03 1.81 0.80 0.61 3.37 0.18 7.81 77.52 0.61 90.63 88.72 TM02-6 粉砂岩 64.25 15.66 0.83 6.28 0.04 1.91 0.85 1.79 2.99 0.17 5.21 68.20 0.83 79.39 75.34 TM02-7 粉砂岩 62.53 16.28 0.76 6.93 0.03 1.94 0.89 1.48 3.32 0.22 5.59 69.54 0.81 82.16 78.20 TM02-8 泥页岩 65.26 11.63 0.45 3.63 0.16 1.23 5.91 2.49 2.37 0.18 6.68 51.99 1.80 58.72 52.58 TM02-9 砂岩 73.40 11.97 0.46 3.61 0.05 1.18 1.41 3.23 1.05 0.11 3.53 57.74 1.01 61.08 58.69 TM02-10 泥岩 67.71 14.95 0.81 3.91 0.05 1.66 1.18 1.99 3.35 0.13 4.24 63.13 0.85 74.54 68.92 TM02-11 泥岩 77.09 10.67 0.34 2.15 0.05 0.82 1.42 2.79 1.65 0.10 2.92 55.02 1.03 60.60 56.15 平均值 64.93 13.93 0.69 5.35 0.09 1.62 1.96 1.68 2.52 0.17 5.99 67.60 0.98 77.23 73.85 PAAS 62.80 18.90 1.00 0.11 2.20 1.30 1.20 3.70 0.16 表 2 研究区新田沟组碎屑岩微量元素含量(10−6)
Table 2 Contents of trace elements in clastic rocks of Xintiangou Formation in the study area (10−6)
样品
编号岩性 Sc V Cr Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Rb Sr Zr Nb Cs Pb Th U Ba Hf XG01-1 页岩 18.17 128.34 101.06 29.66 53.27 41.98 98.57 24.60 127.20 89.46 350.62 15.24 9.86 26.81 14.97 3.42 487.62 9.83 XG01-2 页岩 13.51 92.80 74.40 12.77 34.56 27.39 91.19 19.49 88.23 90.36 300.45 14.60 5.14 21.81 13.20 2.83 405.57 8.74 XG01-3 页岩 18.87 137.54 98.28 12.88 47.10 42.72 114.66 25.68 145.81 80.53 332.34 16.18 11.03 27.11 15.26 3.27 554.51 9.92 XG01-4 页岩 19.84 149.67 91.52 7.85 46.71 51.16 98.56 27.65 172.18 79.91 326.04 15.66 12.06 23.26 15.91 4.17 540.64 9.33 XG01-5 泥岩 15.36 97.76 73.19 13.19 37.42 28.76 94.44 21.57 106.99 106.82 332.59 13.86 5.96 24.99 13.96 3.71 604.63 9.34 XG01-6 砂岩 11.16 82.81 56.62 10.74 23.07 10.65 64.24 15.84 45.81 101.33 312.39 13.69 1.77 13.53 12.56 2.70 383.32 9.41 XG01-7 砂岩 6.47 45.99 31.74 9.15 20.30 11.79 53.20 13.63 65.69 165.55 185.76 6.66 1.70 17.84 7.30 1.72 518.89 5.24 XG01-8 泥岩 15.27 103.63 73.25 19.04 41.05 32.63 84.65 22.16 131.82 91.06 405.31 14.50 9.99 18.75 12.91 2.28 585.97 8.56 XG01-9 泥岩 13.22 87.19 81.33 14.50 41.27 31.80 85.09 20.00 105.52 116.69 281.75 13.88 5.06 20.66 12.72 2.60 606.81 8.07 XG01-10 砂岩 10.11 74.62 50.70 11.00 26.70 12.68 55.18 15.95 59.30 97.57 267.36 11.92 2.26 14.65 9.47 2.18 417.82 7.83 XG01-11 砂岩 8.23 60.73 45.41 7.77 21.26 10.52 49.26 14.26 56.48 143.72 251.29 10.86 10.60 14.03 7.42 2.03 539.19 6.78 XG01-12 粉砂岩 16.39 106.86 84.77 17.09 39.25 32.83 92.00 22.07 113.02 146.62 360.00 14.80 6.54 19.40 13.08 4.65 643.74 9.19 XG01-13 砂岩 9.75 65.45 71.20 11.82 19.78 9.47 52.55 15.06 64.88 111.37 311.09 15.10 2.03 15.93 14.76 2.99 574.56 9.56 XG01-14 砂岩 7.59 54.89 37.96 9.01 22.95 15.31 63.16 13.40 61.63 152.49 244.42 8.19 1.59 14.43 9.87 2.17 678.55 7.05 XG01-15 粉砂岩 16.19 136.18 80.07 10.89 39.58 40.78 87.95 21.92 171.66 103.77 228.01 13.23 13.69 20.41 10.90 3.12 686.77 6.51 XG01-16 砂岩 4.99 32.502 21.53 6.07 12.06 101.9 33.39 10.22 58.53 189.00 146.66 5.51 1.38 13.01 4.91 3.47 651.46 4.44 XG01-17 泥岩 14.97 102.44 61.52 10.38 39.17 28.58 92.05 22.08 133.18 101.19 281.27 13.22 7.05 18.57 13.51 2.05 596.81 8.20 TM02-1 砂岩 7.54 48.86 52.37 10.78 33.63 10.98 68.25 12.45 31.25 74.74 207.08 10.61 1.84 17.39 6.29 1.93 295.08 6.21 TM02-2 页岩 20.51 148.94 95.578 28.03 66.49 50.40 130.53 28.44 155.86 97.13 365.99 15.93 10.87 33.11 16.80 3.79 509.98 10.46 TM02-3 粉砂岩 14.19 91.59 77.07 13.73 33.44 26.55 93.32 22.10 87.13 112.48 406.66 15.19 5.37 22.29 13.98 3.98 468.59 11.75 TM02-4 砂岩 9.68 67.19 49.00 11.64 22.13 9.09 63.78 15.31 49.46 147.56 235.07 11.31 1.97 16.44 8.45 1.80 468.22 6.19 TM02-5 泥页岩 18.24 129.09 80.10 11.72 43.92 43.26 105.63 27.15 146.84 101.99 330.92 15.93 9.93 35.49 17.86 3.56 498.19 9.17 TM02-6 粉砂岩 14.15 92.11 78.02 14.01 39.27 27.97 90.66 21.81 107.91 122.27 307.19 13.89 6.43 20.05 12.32 2.49 645.87 9.16 TM02-7 粉砂岩 15.64 99.41 70.94 8.57 36.99 30.67 100.28 20.85 117.13 107.46 294.89 12.17 8.00 24.46 10.54 3.28 710.38 8.36 TM02-8 泥页岩 7.50 52.49 42.42 9.14 22.80 9.02 49.21 13.96 79.44 190.84 184.44 10.53 2.21 16.82 6.05 1.47 676.98 5.30 TM02-9 砂岩 7.59 52.87 39.29 9.19 20.27 9.96 49.12 14.36 33.46 244.14 163.71 9.81 1.54 14.79 6.19 1.28 402.81 4.88 TM02-10 泥岩 13.35 94.05 70.21 13.20 30.77 24.50 71.60 19.72 121.20 164.75 316.80 12.74 7.83 21.09 13.70 3.10 651.89 9.55 TM02-11 泥岩 6.49 71.65 31.95 8.15 17.30 10.11 41.07 11.59 49.31 195.64 139.68 8.74 1.77 14.70 5.42 1.14 470.00 4.08 平均值 12.68 89.56 65.05 12.57 33.30 27.98 77.63 19.04 95.96 125.94 281.06 12.64 5.91 20.07 11.44 2.75 545.53 7.97 表 3 研究区新田沟组碎屑岩REE含量(10−6)
Table 3 REE contents of clastic rocks in Xintiangou Formation, study area (10−6)
样品
编号岩性 La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Y XG01-1 页岩 43.07 80.71 8.85 34.53 6.10 1.16 4.97 0.78 4.47 0.96 3.00 0.51 3.47 0.51 23.12 XG01-2 页岩 44.08 80.02 9.82 36.95 6.95 1.36 6.36 0.97 5.30 1.05 3.08 0.48 3.11 0.48 27.76 XG01-3 页岩 45.38 85.39 10.01 41.03 7.39 1.44 6.38 1.02 5.49 1.18 3.46 0.56 3.69 0.56 31.62 XG01-4 页岩 49.09 68.40 11.90 45.03 8.34 1.66 7.47 1.16 6.55 1.30 3.65 0.58 3.71 0.60 35.29 XG01-5 泥岩 50.30 75.27 12.12 47.10 9.20 1.88 8.54 1.29 8.76 1.38 3.83 0.59 3.71 0.57 34.43 XG01-6 砂岩 42.74 81.22 9.47 39.06 6.90 1.28 5.87 0.89 4.76 0.91 2.60 0.40 2.65 0.42 22.15 XG01-7 砂岩 26.06 45.31 5.43 18.11 3.95 0.93 3.70 0.56 3.11 0.62 1.84 0.28 1.74 0.28 17.41 XG01-8 泥岩 42.14 73.76 8.71 35.13 6.56 1.32 5.77 0.91 5.11 1.03 2.93 0.49 3.09 0.48 30.20 XG01-9 泥岩 44.25 77.26 9.80 37.96 7.28 1.54 6.88 1.04 7.15 1.11 3.08 0.47 3.12 0.47 30.67 XG01-10 砂岩 38.43 69.08 7.99 32.60 5.65 1.12 4.92 0.76 3.95 0.81 2.33 0.37 2.33 0.35 20.38 XG01-11 砂岩 32.78 57.64 6.78 27.15 4.69 1.03 3.96 0.63 3.40 0.67 2.02 0.31 2.80 0.32 17.39 XG01-12 粉砂岩 43.16 80.41 9.18 37.19 6.77 1.46 5.94 0.95 5.40 1.05 3.11 0.51 3.31 0.48 30.56 XG01-13 砂岩 53.62 93.96 11.96 42.63 7.37 1.36 6.22 0.97 5.14 1.06 2.97 0.47 2.99 0.45 25.98 XG01-14 砂岩 34.64 61.85 8.04 30.17 5.39 1.12 4.87 0.72 3.84 0.77 2.18 0.33 2.34 0.34 20.98 XG01-15 粉砂岩 28.20 50.66 5.61 22.81 4.11 0.96 4.45 0.66 3.95 0.87 2.62 0.46 2.99 0.48 23.22 XG01-16 砂岩 26.66 45.04 5.70 18.75 4.03 1.09 4.06 0.62 3.41 0.69 1.95 0.30 1.90 0.29 21.17 XG01-17 泥岩 41.24 73.77 8.81 33.41 6.02 1.29 5.53 0.86 4.85 1.02 2.92 0.45 2.93 0.46 26.44 TM02-1 砂岩 30.95 61.84 7.29 30.99 6.26 1.20 5.30 0.81 4.00 0.76 2.07 0.31 2.02 0.31 17.43 TM02-2 页岩 47.80 91.09 11.01 41.35 7.43 1.43 6.47 1.27 5.79 1.21 3.62 0.65 3.98 0.62 34.28 TM02-3 粉砂岩 44.68 84.37 11.00 41.52 7.99 1.56 7.21 1.14 6.37 1.27 3.58 0.58 3.66 0.57 35.93 TM02-4 砂岩 43.96 73.08 9.22 39.18 7.12 1.50 6.62 1.06 5.60 1.10 2.92 0.48 2.66 0.39 34.19 TM02-5 泥页岩 52.59 102.70 11.94 42.56 7.48 1.37 6.13 0.98 5.20 1.08 3.19 0.51 3.62 0.54 25.99 TM02-6 粉砂岩 37.81 72.38 8.16 33.75 6.09 1.33 5.42 0.88 4.94 1.05 3.07 0.49 3.23 0.49 25.93 TM02-7 粉砂岩 37.17 66.71 8.41 35.16 6.78 1.51 6.26 1.01 5.60 1.10 4.90 0.48 3.22 0.49 31.34 TM02-8 泥页岩 32.45 62.04 7.35 31.78 6.26 1.49 5.71 0.88 4.62 0.90 2.36 0.35 2.22 0.34 24.22 TM02-9 砂岩 27.06 50.08 5.89 24.03 4.32 1.02 3.81 0.60 3.23 0.64 1.85 0.28 1.89 0.27 16.16 TM02-10 泥岩 43.34 87.19 9.74 38.72 6.90 1.36 5.93 0.92 5.16 1.05 2.99 0.48 3.13 0.48 25.54 TM02-11 泥岩 19.60 38.68 4.39 18.19 3.49 0.82 3.16 0.49 2.69 0.55 1.51 0.24 1.57 0.24 13.59 平均值 39.33 71.07 8.74 34.17 6.32 1.31 5.64 0.89 4.92 0.97 2.84 0.44 2.90 0.44 25.83 C1球粒陨石 0.237 0.612 0.095 0.467 0.153 0.058 0.2055 0.0374 0.254 0.0566 0.1655 0.0255 0.17 0.0254 表 4 研究区新田沟组碎屑岩REE北美页岩标准化值
Table 4 Standardized values of REE North American shale in clastic rocks of Xintiangou Formation in the study area
样品编号 岩性 ΣREE LREE HREE LREE/HREE (La/Yb)N δEu δCe XG01-1 页岩 193.09 174.42 18.67 9.34 1.17 0.99 0.98 XG01-2 页岩 200.01 179.18 20.83 8.60 1.34 0.96 0.91 XG01-3 页岩 212.98 190.64 22.34 8.53 1.16 0.98 0.95 XG01-4 页岩 209.44 184.42 25.02 7.37 1.25 0.99 0.67 XG01-5 泥岩 224.54 195.87 28.67 6.83 1.28 1.00 0.72 XG01-6 砂岩 199.17 180.67 18.50 9.77 1.52 0.94 0.96 XG01-7 砂岩 111.92 99.79 12.13 8.23 1.41 1.14 0.90 XG01-8 泥岩 187.43 167.62 19.81 8.46 1.29 1.01 0.91 XG01-9 泥岩 201.41 178.09 23.32 7.64 1.34 1.02 0.88 XG01-10 砂岩 170.69 154.87 15.82 9.79 1.56 1.00 0.93 XG01-11 砂岩 144.18 130.07 14.11 9.22 1.10 1.12 0.91 XG01-12 粉砂岩 198.92 178.17 20.75 8.59 1.23 1.08 0.96 XG01-13 砂岩 231.17 210.90 20.27 10.40 1.69 0.94 0.88 XG01-14 砂岩 156.6 141.21 15.39 9.18 1.40 1.03 0.88 XG01-15 粉砂岩 128.83 112.35 16.48 6.82 0.89 1.05 0.95 XG01-16 砂岩 114.49 101.27 13.22 7.66 1.32 1.26 0.86 XG01-17 泥岩 183.56 164.54 19.02 8.65 1.33 1.049 0.92 TM02-1 砂岩 154.11 138.53 15.58 8.89 1.44 0.98 0.98 TM02-2 页岩 223.72 200.11 23.61 8.48 1.13 0.97 0.94 TM02-3 粉砂岩 215.50 191.12 24.38 7.84 1.15 0.96 0.90 TM02-4 砂岩 194.89 174.06 20.83 8.36 1.56 1.03 0.86 TM02-5 泥页岩 239.89 218.64 21.25 10.29 1.37 0.95 0.97 TM02-6 粉砂岩 179.09 159.52 19.57 8.15 1.10 1.09 0.97 TM02-7 粉砂岩 178.8 155.74 23.06 6.75 1.09 1.09 0.89 TM02-8 泥页岩 158.75 141.37 17.38 8.13 1.38 1.17 0.95 TM02-9 砂岩 124.97 112.40 12.57 8.94 1.35 1.18 0.94 TM02-10 泥岩 207.39 187.25 20.14 9.30 1.31 1.00 1.01 TM02-11 泥岩 95.62 85.17 10.45 8.15 1.18 1.16 0.99 注:δEu=$ \dfrac{{2\omega ({\text{Eu}})}}{{\omega ({\text{Sm}}) + \omega ({\text{Gd}})}} $、δCe=$ \dfrac{{2\omega ({\text{Ce}})}}{{\omega ({\text{La}}) + \omega ({\text{Pr}})}} $,文中下标N表示元素相对球粒陨石标准化值(HasKin et al.,1968),下标S为PAAS标准化值(Taylor et al.,1985)。 表 5 不同构造背景砂岩的REE特征与研究区新田沟组砂岩对比
Table 5 REE characteristics of sandstones with different tectonic settings and comparison of sandstones in Xintiangou Formation
构造环境 物源类型 REE参数 La Ce ΣREE La/Yb Lan/Ybn ΣLREE/ΣhREE δEu 大洋岛弧 未切割岩浆弧 8±1.7 19±3.7 58±10 4.2±1.3 2.8±0.9 3.8±0.9 1.04±0.11 大陆岛弧 切割岩浆弧 27±4.5 59±8.2 146±20 11±3.6 7.5±2.5 7.7±1.7 0.79±0.13 安第斯型陆缘 隆升基底 37 78 186 12.5 8.5 9.1 0.6 被动陆缘 克拉通内部构造高地 39 85 210 15.9 10.8 8.5 0.56 本文数据 39.4±8.58 71.07±15.49 180.04±38.19 13.76±1.79 9.87±1.28 8.51±0.95 0.66±0.05 表 6 研究区新田沟组与不同大地构造环境砂岩主量元素(%)对比表
Table 6 Comparison of Major Elements (%) of Sandstone between Xintiangou Formation and Different Tectonic Environments in the Study Area
主量元素及比值(%) 研究区平均值 显生宙不同构造环境下杂砂岩 大洋岛弧 大陆岛弧 安第斯型大陆边缘 被动大陆边缘 SiO2 64.93±6.91 58.83±1.60 70.69±2.60 73.86±4.00 81.95±6.20 Al2O3 14.93±3.12 17.11±1.70 14.04±1.10 12.89±2.10 8.41±2.20 TFe2O3 5.35±1.61 7.47±2.60 4.48±0.90 2.88±1.40 3.08±2.8 MnO 0.09±0.12 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.50 MgO 1.62±0.52 3.65±0.70 1.97±0.50 1.23±0.50 1.39±0.80 Na2O 1.68±0.72 4.10±0.80 3.12±0.40 2.77±0.70 1.07±0.60 K2O 2.52±0.80 1.60±0.60 1.89±0.50 2.90±0.50 1.71±0.60 TiO2 0.70±0.19 1.06±0.20 0.64±0.10 0.46±0.10 10.49±0.20 P2O5 0.17±0.06 1.71±0.60 0.16±0.10 0.09 0.12 TFe2O3+ MgO 6.97±2.04 11.73 6.79 4.63 2.89 SiO2/Al2O3 4.63±1.4 3.45 5.00 5.56 10.00 K2O/Na2O 2.22±2.01 0.39 0.61 0.99 1.60 表 7 不同构造环境碎屑岩的特征微量元素比值
Table 7 Characteristic trace element ratios of clastic rocks in different tectonic environments
构造环境 Rb/Sr Zr/Hf Zr/Th Sc/Cr 大洋岛弧 0~0.1 45.7 34.6~61.4 0.41~0.73 大陆岛弧 0.32~0.98 36.3 19.1~23.9 0.38~0.26 活动大陆边缘 0.65~1.13 26.3 8.8~10.4 0.28~0.32 被动大陆边缘 0.79~1.59 29.5 13.3~24.9 0.14~0.18 本文数据 0.14~2.15 35.23(平均值) 18.53~33.87 0.14~0.24 注:除本文数据外,其他引自朱志军等2012。 -
陈宗清 . 论川东地区侏罗系油气藏勘探[J]. 石油与天然气地质,1990 ,11 (1 ):304 −312 . doi: 10.11743/ogg19900312CHEN Zongqing . Jurassic Hydrocarbon Exploration in East Sichuan[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,1990 ,11 (1 ):304 −312 . doi: 10.11743/ogg19900312陈世加, 高兴军, 王力, 等 . 川中地区侏罗系凉高山组致密砂岩含油性控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2014 ,41 (4 ):421 −427 . doi: 10.11698/PED.2014.04.05CHEN Shijia, GAO Xingjun, WANG Li, et a1 . Factors Controlling Oiliness of Jurassic Lianggaoshan Tight Sands in Central Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014 ,41 (4 ):421 −427 . doi: 10.11698/PED.2014.04.05方国庆 . K2O/(Na2O+CaO)-SiO2/Al2O3: 一个用于推断复理石形成时板块构造背景的判别图[J]. 西北地质科学,1993 ,74 (1 ):121 −125 .FANG Guoqing . K2O/(Na2O+CaO)-SiO2/Al2O3: A Diagram for Determining the Plate Tectonic Setting of Flysh[J]. Northwest Geoscience,1993 ,74 (1 ):121 −125 .和政军, 李锦轶, 莫申国, 等 . 漠河前陆盆地砂岩岩石地球化学的构造背景和物源区分析[J]. 中国科学(D辑),2003 ,33 (12 ):1219 −1226 . doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2003.12.011HE Zhengjun, LI Jinyi, MO Shenguo, et a1 . Structural Background and Provenance Analysis of Sandstone Rock Geochemistry in Mohe Foreland Basin[J]. Chinese Science(Series D),2003 ,33 (12 ):1219 −1226 . doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2003.12.011侯伟, 刘招君, 何玉平, 等 . 漠河盆地上侏罗统物源分析及其地质意义[J]. 地质论评,2010 ,56 (1 ):71 −81 .HOU Wei, LIU Zhaojun, HE Yuping, et a1 . Provenance Analysis of Upper Jurassic and Its Geological Significances in Mohe Basin[J]. Geological Review,2010 ,56 (1 ):71 −81 .黄东, 李育聪, 刘敏, 等 . 川中地区中侏罗统沙溪庙组-段油气藏特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 中国石油勘探,2017 ,22 (2 ):44 −49 .HUANG Dong, LI Yucong, LIU Min, et al . Reservoir Features and Exploration Potential of Thelst Member of Shaximiao Formation of Middle Jurassic Incentral Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2017 ,22 (2 ):44 −49 .蒋裕强, 漆麟, 邓海波, 等 . 四川盆地侏罗系油气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业,2010 ,30 (3 ):22 −26 .JIANG Yuqiang, QI Lin, DENG Haibo, et al . Hydrocarbon Accumulation Conditions And Exploration Potentials of the Jurassic Reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2010 ,30 (3 ):22 −26 .李书兵, 许国明, 宋晓波 . 川西龙门山前构造带彭州雷口坡组大型气田的形成条件[J]. 中国石油勘探,2016 ,21 (3 ):74 −82 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2016.03.007LI Shubing, XU Guoming, SONG Xiaobo . Forming Conditions of Pengzhou Large gas Field of Leikoupo Formation in Longmenshan Piedmont Tectonic Belt, Western Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2016 ,21 (3 ):74 −82 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2016.03.007李扬, 张凤生, 李建玉, 等 . 川中大安寨段致密灰岩储层核磁共振T2谱特征与解析[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2017 ,24 (1 ):11 −18+42 .LI Yang, ZHANG Fengsheng, LI Jianyu, et al . Characterization and Evaluation of NMR T2, Spectrum of the Tight Limestone Reservoir in the Daanzhai Formation, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Elficiency,2017 ,24 (1 ):11 −18+42 .李双应, 杨栋栋, 王松, 等 . 南天山中段上石炭统碎屑岩岩石学、地球化学、重矿物和锆石年代学特征及其对物源区、构造演化的约束[J]. 地质学报,2014 ,88 (2 ):167 −184 .LI Shuangying, YANG Dongdong, WANG Song, et al . Characteristics of Petrology, Geochemistry, Heavy Minerals and Isotope Chronology of Upper Carboniferous Detrital Rocks in the Middle Segment of South Tianshan and Constraints to the Provenance and Tectonic Evolution[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2014 ,88 (2 ):167 −184 .李朝辉. 四川盆地侏罗纪岩相古地理研究[D]. 四川: 成都理工大学, 2016, 1−91. LI Zhaohui. Study on the Jurassic Lithofacies and Paleogeography of Sichuan Basin[D]. Sichuan: Chengdu University of Technology, 2016, 1−91.
罗彦军, 王斌, 王国灿, 等. 西南天山下泥盆统阿帕达尔坎组砂岩物源及构造环境研究[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 1−21. LUO Yanjun, WANG Bin, WANG Guocan, et al. Study on Sandstone Provenance and Tectonic Environment of Lower Devonian Apadarkan Formation in Southwest Tianshan[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 1−21.
屈红军, 马强, 董云鹏, 等 . 大巴山前陆盆地晚三叠世—侏罗纪沉积中心的迁移及古流向[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2009 ,30 (5 ):584 −634 .QU Hongjun, MA Qiang, DONG Yunpeng, et al . Migration of the Late Triassic-Jurassic Depocenter and Paleocurrent Direction in the Dabashan Foreland Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2009 ,30 (5 ):584 −634 .屈李华, 刘喜方, 赵芳, 等 . 北羌塘盆地三叠系康南组砂岩地球化学特征及其对物源区和构造背景的制约[J]. 西北地质,2018 ,51 (4 ):97 −113 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2018.04.011QU Lihua, LIU Xifang, ZHAO Fang, et al . Geochemical characteristics of the Sandstones from Triassic Kangnan Formation in North Qiangtang Basin(Tibet): Implication for Provenance and tectonic setting[J]. Northwestern Geology,2018 ,51 (4 ):97 −113 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2018.04.011王金贵, 张鑫全, 魏文通, 等 . 西藏雅鲁藏布缝合带三叠系朗杰学群沉积岩古生物、地球化学特征及其物源区和构造背景分析[J]. 地质学报,2020 ,94 (4 ):1208 −1226 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.04.013WANG Jingui, ZHANG Xinquan, WEI Wentong, et al . Paleontology, geochemistry and provenance of sedimentary rocks from the Triassic Langjiexue Group in the Yarlung Zangbo suture zone, Tibet and their tectonic setting[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2020 ,94 (4 ):1208 −1226 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.04.013王世谦, 罗启后, 邓鸿赋, 等 . 四川盆地西部侏罗系天然气成藏特征[J]. 天然气工业,2001 ,21 (2 ):1 −8 . doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2001.02.001WANG Shiqian, LUO Qihou, DENG Hongbin, et al . Characteristics of Forming Jurassic Gas Reservoirs in the West Part of Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2001 ,21 (2 ):1 −8 . doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2001.02.001王世谦, 胡素云, 董大忠 . 川东侏罗系一四川盆地亟待重视的一个致密油气新领域[J]. 天然气工业,2012 ,32 (12 ):22 −29 . doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.12.005WANG Shiqian, HU Suyun, DONG Dazhong . Jurassic Tight Oil & Gas Resources in East Sichuan Basin: A New Exploration Target[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2012 ,32 (12 ):22 −29 . doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.12.005王世谦, 陈更生, 黄先平 . 四川盆地油气资源潜力及重点勘探领域[J]. 石油学报,2005 ,26 (Supp.1 ):97 −101 .WANG Shiqian, CHEN Gengsheng, HUANG Xianping . Petroleum Resource Potential and Major Exploration Areas in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005 ,26 (Supp.1 ):97 −101 .韦清海, 梁周礼. 1: 20万达县幅、垫江幅、涪陵福区域地质调查报告[R]. 四川省地质局一零七地质队, 1980, 1−92. 许芳磊. 南秦岭大巴山北缘构造变形与区域构造演化[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012, 1−64. XU Fanglei. Deformation Sequence and Regional Tectonic Evolution In the North Margin of South Qinling Daba Mountain[D]. Beijing: China University of Geoscience(Beijing), 2012, 1−64.
杨国臣. 四川盆地晚侏罗世至新近纪层序充填及构造一岩相古地理演化[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2010, 1−226. YANG Guochen. Evolution of Sequence-filling and Tectono-lithofacies Paleogeograpgy from Late Jurassic Through Neogene in Sichuan Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geoscience (Beijing), 2010, 1−226.
杨弘忠, 李德亮, 秦溱, 等. 重庆市区域地质志[R]. 重庆市地质调查院, 2016, 1−825. 杨跃明, 文龙, 罗冰, 等 . 四川盆地达州—开江古隆起沉积构造演化及油气成藏条件分析[J]. 天然气工业,2016 ,36 (8 ):1 −10 . doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.08.001YANG Yueming, WEN Long, LUO Bing, et al . Sedimentary Tectonic Evolution and Reservoir-forming Conditions of the Dazhou- Kaijiang Paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2016 ,36 (8 ):1 −10 . doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.08.001张茜, 肖渊甫, 王晓飞, 等 . 四川盆地西南缘龙马溪组泥岩地球化学特征及物源区和构造背景分析[J]. 地质论评,2020 ,66 (05 ):1393 −1411 .ZHANG Qian, XIAO Yuanfu, WANG Xiaofei, et al . Geochemistry of the Longmaxi Formation Mudstones of the Southwest Sichuan Basin: Implications for Provenance and Source Weathering[J]. Geological Review,2020 ,66 (05 ):1393 −1411 .张建军, 牟传龙, 周恳恳, 等 . 滇西户撒盆地芒棒组砂岩地球化学特征及物源区和构造背景分析[J]. 地质学报,2017 ,91 (5 ):1083 −1096 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.05.009ZHANG Jianjun, MO Chuanlong, ZHOU Kenken, et al . Geochemical Characteristic of Sandstones from the Mangbang Formation in the Husa Basin, Western Yuannan, and Its Constraints on Provenances and Tectonic Setting[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2017 ,91 (5 ):1083 −1096 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.05.009张英利, 王宗起, 王坤明, 等 . 北大巴山地区斑鸠关组砂岩地球化学特征对物源和构造环境的限定[J]. 地质学报,2020 ,94 (4 ):1192 −1203 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.04.012ZHANG Yingli, WANG Zongqi, WANG Kunming, et al . Sandstone Geochemical Constraints on the Provenance and Tectonic setting of the Banjiuguan Formation in the North Daba Mountain[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2020 ,94 (4 ):1192 −1203 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.04.012张凤博, 杨云祥 . 甘肃省灵台县灵1井延长组碎屑岩地球化学特征及对源区构造的示踪性[J]. 西北地质,2012 ,45 (3 ):41 −47 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2012.03.006ZHANG Fengbo, YANG Yunxiang . Clastic Rock Geochemical Properties and Its Trace to the Source Area Structures of Yanchang Formation in Lingtai County in Gansu Province[J]. Northwestern Geology,2012 ,45 (3 ):41 −47 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2012.03.006郑志红, 李登华, 白森舒, 等 . 四川盆地天然气资源潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探,2017 ,22 (3 ):12 −20 .ZHENG Zhihong, LI Denghua, BAI Senshu, et al . Resource Potentials of Natural Gas in Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2017 ,22 (3 ):12 −20 .周正茂, 李核良, 赵志强, 等. 重庆市1∶5万周嘉场、拔山寺、高安镇区域地质调查报告[R]. 重庆市地质矿产勘查开发局607地质队, 2021, 1−24. 朱志军, 陈洪德 . 川东南地区志留系小河坝组砂岩特征及物源分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012 ,42 (6 ):1590 −1600 .ZHU Zhijun, CHEN Hongde . Sandstone Characteristics and Provenance Analysis of the Sandtone in Silurian Xiaoheba Formation in Southeastern Sichuan Province, China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2012 ,42 (6 ):1590 −1600 .邹娟, 金涛, 李雪松, 等 . 川东地区下侏罗统勘探潜力评价[J]. 中国石油勘探,2018 ,23 (4 ):30 −38 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.04.004ZOU Juan, JIN Tao, LI Xuesong, et al . Evaluation on Expioration Potentials of Lower Jurassic Reservoirs in Eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2018 ,23 (4 ):30 −38 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.04.004BAI Yueyue, LIU Zhaojun, SUN Pingchang, et al . Rare Earth and Major Element Geochemistry of Eocene Fine-grained Sediments in Oil Shale-and Coal-bearing Layers of the Meihe Basin, Northeast China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2015 ,97 :89 −101 . doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.10.008Bhatia M R, Taylor S R . Trace-element Geochemistry and Sedimentary Provinces: a Study from the Tasman Geosynclines, Australia[J]. Chemical Geology,1981 ,33 :115 −125 . doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(81)90089-9Bhatia M R . Plate Tectonics and Geochemical Composition of Sandstone[J]. The Journal of Geology,1983 ,91 (6 ):611 −627 . doi: 10.1086/628815Bhatia M R . Rare Element Geochemistry of Australian Paleozoic Greywackes and Mudrocks: Provenance and Tectonic Control[J]. Sedimentary Geology,1985 ,45 :97 −113 . doi: 10.1016/0037-0738(85)90025-9Bhatia M R, Crook K A W . Trace Element Characteristics of Graywackes and Tectonic Setting of Sedimentary Asina[J]. Contributions to Minaralogy and Petrology,1986 ,92 :181 −193 . doi: 10.1007/BF00375292Bhatia M . R. Plate Tectonics and Geochemical Composttion of Sandstones[J]. The Journal of Geology,1983 ,91 (6 ):611 −627 . doi: 10.1086/628815Bhatia M R, Crook K A W . Trace Element Chara-cteristics of Greywackes and Tectonic Setting Discrinination Sedimentary Basin[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology,1986 ,92 (2 ):181 −193 . doi: 10.1007/BF00375292Cox R, Lowe D R, Cullers R L . The Influence of Sediment Recycling and Basement Composition on Evolution of Mudrock Chemistry in Southwestern United States[J]. Geochim Cosmochim Acta,1995 ,59 (14 ):2919 −2940 . doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00185-9Floyd P A, Leveridge B E . Tectonic Environment of the Devonian Gramscatho Basin, South Cornwall: Framework Mode and Geochemical Evidence from Turbiditic Sandstones[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, London,1987 ,144 :531 −542 . doi: 10.1144/gsjgs.144.4.0531Gu X X, Liu J M, Zheng J H, et al . Provenance and Tectonic Setting of the Proterozoic Turbidites in Hunan, South China: Geochemical Evidence[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research,2002 ,72 :393 −407 . doi: 10.1306/081601720393HE Zhengjun, LI Jinyi, Mo Shenguo, et al . Geochemical Discriminations of Sandstones from the Mohe Foreland Basin, Northeastern China: Tectonic Setting and Provenance[J]. Science in China: Series D,2003 ,33 (12 ):1219 −1226 .Roser B P, Korsch J R . Provenance Signatures of Sandstone Mudstone Suites Determined Using Discriminant Function Analysis of Majorelement Data[J]. Chemical Geology,1988 ,67 :119 −139 . doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(88)90010-1Shields G, Stille P . Diagenetic Constraints on the Use of Cerium Anomalies as Palaeoseawater Redox Proxies: an Isotopic and REE Study of Cambrian Phosphorites[J]. Chemical Geology,2001 ,175 (1−2 ):29 −48 .Taylor S R, Mclennan S H. The Continential Crust: Its Composition and Evolution[M]. Oxford: Black-Well, 1985: 117−140.