ISSN 1009-6248CN 61-1149/P 双月刊

主管单位:中国地质调查局

主办单位:中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心
中国地质学会

    高级检索
    李彦娥,王化齐,马红娜,等. 陕西省农田生态系统碳汇核算方法对比研究[J]. 西北地质,xxxx,x(x): x−xx. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024089
    引用本文: 李彦娥,王化齐,马红娜,等. 陕西省农田生态系统碳汇核算方法对比研究[J]. 西北地质,xxxx,x(x): x−xx. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024089
    LI Yan’e,WANG Huaqi,MA Hongna,et al. Comparative Study on Carbon Sink Accounting Methods for Farmland Ecosystems in Shaanxi Province[J]. Northwestern Geology,xxxx,x(x): x−xx. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024089
    Citation: LI Yan’e,WANG Huaqi,MA Hongna,et al. Comparative Study on Carbon Sink Accounting Methods for Farmland Ecosystems in Shaanxi Province[J]. Northwestern Geology,xxxx,x(x): x−xx. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2024089

    陕西省农田生态系统碳汇核算方法对比研究

    Comparative Study on Carbon Sink Accounting Methods for Farmland Ecosystems in Shaanxi Province

    • 摘要: 为筛选农田生态系统碳汇精准评估的适宜方法,笔者采用净碳汇法和固碳速率法分别核算陕西省农田生态系统碳汇,研究两种方法的固碳时空分布差异。结果表明:①净碳汇法核算值大于固碳速率法,固碳速率法核算值仅占净碳汇核算值的12.8%~18.2%。②两者整体均呈碳汇状态。时间序列上,净碳汇法2005~2020年碳汇总量整体呈波动上升趋势,而固碳速率法表现为先上升后下降态势;空间分布上净碳汇法表现为中部>北部>南部,而固碳速率法则表现为中部>南部>北部。③目前净碳汇法更适用于陕西省农田生态系统碳汇核算,2020年其值为507.66万tC。但考虑免耕和秸秆还田率提高因素,两种方法核算结果单位基本一致,具有可比性。今后应加大农田土壤有机碳变化监测力度,加强农田管理措施碳汇研究,对于固碳速率法精准评估农田土壤生态系统碳汇极其重要。

       

      Abstract: To screen suitable methods for precise assessment of carbon sink in agricultural ecosystems, the author used the net carbon sequestration method and the carbon sequestration rate method to quantitatively calculate the carbon sequestration of agricultural ecosystems in Shaanxi Province in 2020, and studied the differences in carbon sequestration and spatial distribution between the two methods. The results show that: ① The net carbon sink method has a higher accounting value than the carbon sequestration rate method, and the carbon sequestration rate method only accounts for 12.8%-18.2% of the net carbon sink accounting value. ② Both are in a carbon sink state as a whole. In terms of time series, the total carbon sequestration amount of the net carbon sequestration method showed a fluctuating upward trend from 2005 to 2020, while the carbon sequestration rate method showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing; In terms of spatial distribution, the net carbon sink method shows central>northern>southern, while the carbon sequestration rate law shows central>southern>northern. ③ At present, the net carbon sequestration method is more suitable for calculating the carbon sink of agricultural ecosystems in Shaanxi Province, with a value of 5.0766 million tC in 2020. However, considering the factors that increase the rate of no till and straw return, the two methods have consistent accounting units and are comparable. In the future, it is extremely important to increase the monitoring of changes in organic carbon in farmland soil, strengthen research on carbon sequestration measures in farmland management, and accurately evaluate carbon sink in farmland soil ecosystems using the carbon sequestration rate method.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回