Evaluation of Resource Environment Carrying Capacity: Theoretical Method and Practice
-
摘要: 资源环境承载力评价是国土空间规划和三区三线划定的基础，评价理论与方法越来越受到各界的关注，但尚未形成完备的理论框架。本研究引入短板理论、风险理论和边际理论，构建资源环境承载力评价的理论框架与技术方法，并以陕北黄土高原绥德县为研究区开展实证研究。基于短板理论，识别区域重大资源环境问题，遴选1~3个制约性因素；基于边际理论，以资源开发利用利润最大化或无利润作为资源承载力评价标准，开展资源承载力评价；基于风险理论，以人类活动带来的环境问题或灾害引发的生命和财产风险的容许标准作为环境承载力评价标准，开展环境承载力评价；基于单因素承载力评价结果，开展综合承载力评价，评价结果为安全承载、容许超载或不可接受超载；将综合承载力评价结果与区域国土空间开发现状或规划结果做叠加分析，划定区域发展三区三线。通过对绥德县资源环境承载力评价，结果表明，该理论框架与技术方法简便易推广，评价结果可信，可以为国土空间优化、科学划定“三条红线”提供支撑。Abstract: The national territory development plan needs to evaluate the resource environmental carrying capacity, which can provide basis for the delineation of so-called "three zones and three lines", that is the spaces for urban, agriculture and ecology, as well as the red lines of environmental protection, permanent basic farmland protection and urban development. The theory and method of resource environmental carrying capacity evaluation have received more and more attention from all stakeholders, but a complete theoretical framework has not yet been formed. This study introduces short-board theory, risk theory and marginal theory, develops the theoretical framework of resource environmental carrying capacity evaluation, and conducts empirical research with the Suide County of the Loess Plateau in Northern Shaanxi as the research area. Based on the short-board theory, we identify the major resource environmental problems in this region, and select 1-3 restrictive factors; On the basis of the marginal theory, we take the maximum profit or no-profit of resource development and utilization as the evaluation standards to carry out the evaluation of resource carrying capacity; According to the risk theory, the allowable standards of environmental issues brought about by human activities or of life and property risks caused by disasters are taken as the evaluation standards to carrying out the evaluation of environmental carrying capacity; By using the single factor carrying capacity evaluation results to carry out the comprehensive carrying capacity evaluation, the results can be classified as safe, overload or unacceptable three categories. The comprehensive carrying capacity evaluation results are overlapped with the regional terrestrial space development status or planning results, which can be used to delineate the "three districts and three lines" of regional development. The resource environmental carrying capacity evaluation results of Suide County show that the theoretical framework and technical method system are simple and easy to promote, and the evaluation results are credible, which can provide support for the optimization of terrestrial space development and the scientific delineation of the "three red lines".
-
-
樊杰, 陶岸君, 陈田, 等.资源环境承载能力评价在汶川地震灾后恢复重建规划中的基础性作用[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2008,23 (05):387-392. FAN Jie, TAO Anjun, CHEN Tian, et al. Fundamental Function in Resource Environment Carrying Capacity Evaluation in theState Planning for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008,23 (05):387-392.
樊杰, 王亚飞, 汤青,等.全国资源环境承载能力监测预警学术思路与总体技术流程[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(1):1-10. FAN Jie, WANG Yafei, TANG Qing, et al. Academic Thought and Technical Progress of Monitoring and Early-warningof the National Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(1):1-10.
樊杰, 周侃, 王亚飞.全国资源环境承载能力预警的基点和技术方法进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(03):266-276. FAN Jie, ZHOU Kan, WANG Yafei. Basic points and progress in technical methods of early-warning of the national resource and environmental carrying capacity[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(3):266-276.
周侃, 樊杰, 徐勇. 面向重建规划的灾后资源环境承载能力应急评价范式[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(03):286-295. ZHOU Kan, FAN Jie, XU Yong. Paradigm and prospects of emergent evaluation of post-disaster resource and environmental carrying capacity for reconstruc-tion planning[J]. Progress in Geography,2017, 36(3):286-295.
刘晓丽, 方创琳. 城市群资源环境承载力研究进展及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(05):35-42. LIU Xiaoli, FANG Chuanglin. Progress and Prospect of Study on Carrying Capacity of Resource and Environment of City Clusters[J]. Progress in Geography, 2008, 27(05):35-42.
程国栋. 承载力概念的演变及西北水资源承载力的应用框架[J]. 冰川冻土, 2002, 24(4):361-367. CHENG Guodong. Evolution of the Concept of Carrying Capacity and the Analysis Frameworkof Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Northwest of China[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2002, 24(4):361-367.
吕一河, 傅微, 李婷, 等. 区域资源环境综合承载力研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37 (1):130-136. LÜ Yihe, FU Wei, LI Ting, et al. Progress and prospects of research on integrated carrying capacity of regional resources and environment[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(1):130-136.
张红伟, 陈伟国. 西部地区资源承载力探析[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2008, 24(3):47-56. ZHANG Hongwei, CHEN Weiguo. Analysis on the Carrying Capacity of Resourcesin Western China[J]. Journal of Yunnan Finance and Trade Institute, 2008, 24(3):47-56.
张茂省, 王尧. 基于风险的地质环境承载力评价[J]. 地质通报, 37(2/3):467-475. ZHANG Maosheng, WANG Yao. Research on the evaluation of the carrying capacity of geological environment based on its risk level[J].Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(2/3):467-475.
向缉熙. 运用新木桶理论探讨制约矿产勘查工作发展的主要因素[J]. 中国地质, 1992,(9):13-16. XIANG Jixi. Exploring the main factors restricting the development of mineral exploration work by using new barrel theory[J]. Chinese Geology, 1992,(9):13-16.
唐亚明, 张茂省. 滑坡风险评价难点及方法综述[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2011, 38(2):130-134. TANG Yaming, ZHANG Maosheng. Landslide risk assessment difficulties and methods[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Ggeology, 2011,38(2):130-134.
毛小苓, 刘阳生. 国内外环境风险评价研究进展[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2003, 11(3):266-273. MAO Xiaoling, LIU Yangsheng. Current Progress of Environmental Risk Assessment Research[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2003, 11(3):266-273.
陈辉, 刘劲松, 曹宇, 等. 生态风险评价研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(5):1558-1566. CHEN Hui, LIU Jinsong, CAO Yu, et al. Progresses of ecological risk assessment[J]. Acta Ecologicasinica, 2006, 26(5):1558-1566.
段涛. 城市再生水的边际机会成本定价方法研究[J]. 生态经济, 2013,(7):138-139. DUAN Tao. Study on Marginal Opportunity Cost Pricing of Urban Recycled Water[J]. Ecological Economy, 2013,(7):138-139.
方红远, 王银堂. 边际成本分析在水资源开发利用决策中的应用[J]. 水科学进展, 2004,(02):243-248. FANG Hongyuan, WANG Yintang. Application of marginal cost analysis to water resources development[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2004,(02):243-248.
江汶静, 田永中, 唐君桃,等. 基于GIS的耕地边际化评价与转移的生态价值评估-以三峡库区涪陵段为例[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(04):101-107. JIANG Wenjing, WANG Yonghe, TANG Juntao, et al. A Gis-Based Estimate of Farmland Marginalization and Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Value after transfer-A Case Study in Fuling District in the Three-Gorges Reservior Area[J]. Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 39(04):101-107.
李升发, 李秀彬. 中国山区耕地利用边际化表现及其机理[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5):803-817. LI Shengfa, LI Xiubin. Economic characteristics and the mechanism of farmland marginalization in mountainous areas of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5):803-817.
吕素冰. 水资源利用的效益分析及结构演化研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2012. LÜ Subing.benefits analysis of water use and evolution of water consumed strusture[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2012.
张瑛. 商品期货投资策略与风险控制研究[D]. 南昌:南昌大学, 2014. ZHANG Ying. Study on Investment Strategy of Commodity Futures and Risk Control[D]. Nanchang:Nanchang University, 2014.
王良健, 李辉, 禹诚, 等. 耕地征收最优规模的理论与实证研究-基于边际理论视角[J]. 中国土地科学, 2013, 27(1):11-19. WANG Liangjian, LI Hui, YU Cheng, et al. Theoretical and Empirical Research on the Optimal Scale of Arable Land Expropriation:Based on the Marginal Theory[J]. China Land Sciences, 2013, 27(1):11-19.
张乐勤, 陈素平, 陈保平. 基于边际效应模型的安徽省建设用地增长极限研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2014, 33(3):148-151. ZHANG Leqin, CHEN Suping, CHEN Baoping. Study on Construction Land Growth Limit of Anhui Province Based on the Marginal Effect Model[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2014, 33(3):148-151.
刘路璐, 刘聪, 吕剑. 一种基于边际理论的成本预测方法的研究[J]. 冶金自动化, 2015, 39(5):22-25. LIU Lulu, LIU Cong, LÜ Jian. Research on a cost prediction method based on marginal theory[J]. Metallurgical Industry Automation, 2015, 39(5):22-25.
张乐勤. 基于边际模型的城镇化进程污染效应极限及演化趋势研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(2):275-286. ZHANG Leqin. A Study on Limit and Evolutionary Trend of Pollution Effect in Process of Urbanization Based on Marginal Model:An Empirical Study of Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(2):275-286.
王欢. 基于边际效用理论的水资源价值研究[D]. 北京:北京工业大学, 2012. WANG Huan. Research of Water Resources Value Based on The Theory of Marginal Utility[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Technology, 2012.
盖美, 郝慧娟, 柯丽娜, 等. 辽宁沿海经济带水资源边际效益测度及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(1):78-91. GAI Mei, HAO Huijuan, KE Lina, et al. The Marginal Benefit of Water Resource Measure and Its Influence Factors in Liaoning Coastal Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(1):78-91.
孙才志, 杨新岩, 王雪妮, 等. 辽宁省水资源利用边际效益的估算与时空差异分析[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2011, 30(1):155-160. SUN Caizhi, YANG Xinyan, WANG Xueni, et al. The Calculation and Temporal-spatial Difference Analysis of Water Utilization Margin Benefit of Liaoning Province[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2011, 30(1):155-160.
史正涛, 刘新有, 黄英, 等. 基于边际效益递减原理的城市水安全评价方法[J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41(5):545-552. SHI Zhengtao, LIU Xinyou, HUANG Ying, et al. Evaluation method for urban water safety based on law of diminishing marginal utility[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41(5):545-552.
吕素冰, 张亮, 王文川, 等. 河南省水资源利用演变及边际效益分析[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(9):28-32. LÜ Subing, ZHANG Liang, WANG Wenchuan, et al. Analysis of Water Consumption and Marginal Benefit of He'nan Province[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(9):28-32.
王智勇, 王劲峰, 于静洁, 等. 河北省平原地区水资源利用的边际效益分析[J]. 地理学报, 2000, 55(3):318-328. WANG Zhiyong, WANG Jinfeng, YU Jingjie, et al.Analysis on Marginal Revenues of Water in Hebei Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(3):318-328.
李爱, 杨正先. 基于边际效应分析的海洋资源环境承载力评估[J]. 海洋开发与管理, 2018, 35(04):44-50. LI Ai, YANG Zhengxian. Assessment of Marine Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity Based on Marginal Effect Analysis[J]. Ocean Development and Management, 2018, 35(04):44-50.
许海东. 基于Cobb-Douglas生产函数的城市工业用水资源边际效益研究[J]. 水利技术监督, 2019(1):107-109. XU Haidong. Study on marginal benefit of urban industrial water resources based on Cobb-Douglas production function[J]. Technical Supervision in Water Resources, 2019(01):107-109.
LEWIS S L. We must set planetary boundaries wisely[J].Nature, 2012, 485(7399):417-417.
KHANNA P, BABU P R, GEORGEJ M S. Carrying-capacity as a basis for sustainable development a case study of National Capital Region in India[J]. Progress in Planning, 1999, 52(2):101-166.
WILLIAM E R. Eeological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and urbanization, 1992, 4(2):121-130.
WANG Yao, ZHANG Maosheng. Risk-based Evaluation of the Geological Environment Carrying Capacity[J]. Proceedings of the 4th Academic Conference of Geology Resource Management and Sustainable Development. 2016, 84-98.
WANG Yao,ZHANG Maosheng,XUE Qiang, et al. Risk-based evaluation on geological environment carrying capacity of mountain city-A case study in Suide County, Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2018, 15(12):173-183.
-
期刊类型引用(23)
1. 郭齐韵，吴华，李佳潼，徐悦，陈琳娜，周建伟. 基于机器学习与样本优化的滑坡易发性评价：以西藏自治区昌都市为例. 地质科学. 2025(01): 308-322 . 
百度学术
2. 申玉松，张宸，王艺杰，张迪. 基于CF-LR模型的河南省信阳市地质灾害易发性评价. 地质与资源. 2024(01): 74-81+134 . 百度学术
3. 高波，董英，贾俊，薛强，武文英，李林，王涛，刘港，江睿君. 甘肃临夏积石山县6.2级地震地质灾害发育特征及危险性评价. 西北地质. 2024(02): 209-219 . 本站查看
4. 任小凯，陈新杰，刘海亭，唐建文，熊平，向阳. 县域地质灾害调查与风险评价方法及工程实践. 西部探矿工程. 2024(08): 9-11+16 . 百度学术
5. 袁亚南，喻根，方斌. 基于GIS的空间TOPSIS模型的安徽省休宁县滑坡易发性评价. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(08): 1087-1093+1099 . 百度学术
6. 张云，资锋，曹运江，成湘伟，韩用顺，唐龙. GIS支持下基于归一化信息量模型的地质灾害易发性评价. 矿业工程研究. 2024(02): 20-28 . 百度学术
7. 孟晓捷，郭小鹏，薛强，冯卫，洪勃. 黄土地质灾害评价因子地形起伏度提取最佳尺度研究：以榆林市米脂县为例. 西北地质. 2024(06): 234-243 . 本站查看
8. 李小倩，钟储汉，孙如华，苏可，刘元杰. 基于GIS和加权信息量模型的普光气田滑坡危险性评价. 河北地质大学学报. 2023(02): 27-32 . 百度学术
9. 邹富宝，付卓，樊风雷，吴华，郭治兴. 基于频率比与AHP模型的西藏东部地区滑坡易发性评价. 自然灾害学报. 2023(02): 235-242 . 百度学术
10. 贾俊，毛伊敏，孟晓捷，高波，高满新，武文英. 深度随机森林和随机森林算法的滑坡易发性评价对比——以汉中市略阳县为例. 西北地质. 2023(03): 239-249 . 本站查看
11. 孟凡奇，高峰，林波，张京钊，徐金梁，牛伟. 基于AHP和信息量模型的地质灾害易发性评价——以鲁东片区为例. 灾害学. 2023(03): 111-117 . 百度学术
12. 张紫昭，张天栋，于喜坤，吕倩俐，赖润森，贾竣予，刘新宇. 新疆崩滑流地质灾害孕灾环境分区及其形成机制. 工程地质学报. 2023(04): 1129-1144 . 百度学术
13. 邱慧玲，龙文华，卿展晖. 模糊数学在滑坡治理工程后评价中的应用. 华南地震. 2023(04): 75-79 . 百度学术
14. 李璇琼，梁延龙. 地质灾害引发土地利用响应机制研究——以四川绵竹为例. 西北地质. 2022(01): 236-248 . 本站查看
15. 孟晓捷，张新社，曾庆铭，王冬. 基于加权信息量法的黄土滑坡易发性评价——以1∶5万天水市麦积幅为例. 西北地质. 2022(02): 249-259 . 本站查看
16. 马啸，王念秦，李晓抗，严冬，李嘉琳. 基于RF-FR模型的滑坡易发性评价——以略阳县为例. 西北地质. 2022(03): 335-344 . 本站查看
17. 孙翊翔，贾俊，张茂省，武文英. 基于斜坡单元下的AHP-信息量法在地质灾害易发性评价中的应用. 地质与资源. 2022(06): 811-820+832 . 百度学术
18. 刘文涛，向明智，陈林，张茂淳，胡华伟. 基于层次分析法的阆中市滑坡地质灾害易发性评价分析. 甘肃水利水电技术. 2022(09): 27-30 . 百度学术
19. 王高峰，郭宁，邓兵，田运涛，叶振南，陈宗良，吕凤兰，高幼龙. 不同组合模型区域滑坡易发性及精度分析. 西北地质. 2021(02): 259-272 . 本站查看
20. 袁康，崔玉龙，胡俊宏，金嘉乐，袁文华. 2019年“利奇马”台风暴雨滑坡分布分析——以安徽省宁国市为例. 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(03): 74-81 . 百度学术
21. 李宇新，邓念东，马建全，周阳，崔阳阳. 基于逻辑回归树和旋转森林模型的滑坡易发性评价. 科学技术与工程. 2021(23): 9725-9732 . 百度学术
22. 张超，朱元彩，韩旭. GIS技术在水文水资源分析管理中的评价指标体系建立与应用. 电子测试. 2021(18): 69-70+53 . 百度学术
23. 宋小川，刘汉湖，张春，周林博. 确定性系数模型的滑坡易发性评价应用与比较. 矿山测量. 2021(05): 65-71 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(26)
计量
- 文章访问数: 2227
- HTML全文浏览量: 19
- PDF下载量: 1930
- 被引次数: 49
下载:
