Characteristics and Controlling Factors of the Reservoirs of 4+5th Member of Yanchang Formation in Fanxue area, Dingbian Oilfield, Ordos basin
-
摘要: 根据对鄂尔多斯盆地定边油田樊学地区长4+5储层特征、成岩作用及物性影响因素研究结果表明，长4+5储层岩性主要为岩屑长石砂岩、长石砂岩，分选性总体中等-较好，磨圆度较差。孔隙类型以残余粒间孔和溶蚀孔为主，分别占总孔隙的59%、34%。孔隙度变化在0.2%~17.6%，平均值为8.5%；渗透率主要分布在0.1×10-3~0.4×10-3μm2，平均值为0.25×10-3μm2，为特低孔特低渗储层。胶结物以方解石等碳酸盐胶结物、黏土矿物和硅质为主。原始沉积组分、碳酸盐胶结作用对储层物性具有重要的影响，塑性物质含量高的储层主要因压实作用变致密。碳酸盐胶结物含量高的储层因胶结作用变致密，刚性物质含量高的储层因刚性物质支撑作用保留较多残余粒间孔及易溶组分的溶蚀作用物性较好。长石、石英等刚性物质含量越高，千枚岩、板岩、云母等塑性物质和碳酸盐胶结物含量越低，储层物性越好。Abstract: Studies on the characteristics of the Reservoirs, lithology and the controlling factors of 4+5th member of Yanchang Formation in Fanxue area of Dingbian oilfield in Ordos basin show that the lithology of the reservoir of 4+5nd member are mainly arkose and lithic feldspar sandstone, with sorting from medium to good, and a poor psephicity. The pore types are mainly residual intergranular pores and dissolution pores, accounting for 59%, 34% of the total pore respectively. The porosity of the reservoir ranges from 0.2% to 17.6%,with the average of 8.5%. The permeability ranges from 0.1×10-3 to 0.4×10-3 μm2,with the average being 0.25×10-3 μm2. The main cements are carbonate, clay and quartz. The contents of sedimentary component, carbonate and clay cement have important impact on the reservoir quality. The reservoir with higher content of rigid particles, lower content of plastic particles and carbonate cement has good quality. The reservoir with higher content of plastic particles has lower porosity and permeability because of compaction, while the reservoir with higher content of carbonate cement has lower porosity and permeability because of carbonate cementation. The porosity and permeability of reservoir increase with the higher content of rigid particles and the lower content of plastic particles and carbonate cements.
-
-
何自新.鄂尔多斯盆地演化与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003. HE Zixin.The Evolution and Petroleum of Ordos Basin[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2003.
苏复义, 周文, 金文辉,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界成藏组合划分与分布评价[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(4):582-590. SU Fuyi, ZHOU Wen, JIN Wenhui, et al. Identification and Distribution of the Mesozoic Plays in Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(4):582-590.
魏笑笑,刘建朝,刘晶晶.鄂尔多斯盆地史家畔地区长61油层沉积微相研究及其对开发的影响[J].西北地质, 2018, 51(4):255-262. WEI Xiaoxiao, LIU Jianchao, LIU Jingjing. Study on Sedimentary Microfacies and Impact on Development of Chang 61 Reservoir in Shijiapan Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2018, 51(4):255-262.
宋健,孟旺才,邓南涛,等.鄂尔多斯盆地富黄地区延长组储层特征及物性影响因素分析[J].西北地质, 2019, 52(1):98-108. SONG Jian, MENG Wangcai, DEN Nantao, et al. Features and Influencing Factors of Yangchang Formation Reservoir in Fuxian-Huangling Exploration Area, Erdos Basin[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2019, 52(1):98-108.
朱谨谨,符超峰,杨海龙,等.鄂尔多斯盆地甘谷驿油区延长组长6储层综合评价[J].西北地质, 2019, 52(1):166-175. ZHU Jinjin, FU Chaofeng, YANG Hailong, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Chang 6 Reservoir from Yanchang Formation in Ganguyi Oil Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Northwestern Geology,2019, 52(1):166-175.
黄思静, 谢连文,张萌,等. 中国三叠系陆相砂岩中自生绿泥石的形成机制及其与储层孔隙保存的关系[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31(3):273-281. HUANG Sijing, XIE Lianwen, ZHANG Meng, et al. Formation Mechanism of Authigenic Chlorite and Relation to Preservation of Porosity in Nonmarine Triassic Reservoir Sandstones, Ordos Basin and Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2004, 31(3):273-281.
邱隆伟, 徐宁宁, 周涌沂, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地地区致密砂岩石英溶解作用及其对优质储集层的影响[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2015, 34(1):38-44. QIU Longwei, XU Ningning, ZHOU Yongyi, et al. Dissolution of Quartz in Tight Sandstones of the Daniudi Area, Ordos Basin, and Its Influence to High Quality Reservoirs[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2015, 34(1):38-44.
田建锋, 刘池阳, 王桂呈, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组砂岩的碱性溶蚀作用[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 2011, 36(1):103-110. TIAN Jianfeng, LIU Chiyang, WANG Guicheng, et al. Alkaline dissolution of Sandstone in the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos basin[J]. Earth Science-Journal of China Univerdisty of Geoscience, 2011, 36(1):103-110.
罗静兰, 刘小洪, 林潼, 等. 成岩作用与油气侵位对鄂尔多斯盆地延长组砂岩储层物性的影响[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(5):664-673. LUO Jinlan, LIU Xiaohong, LIN Tong, et al. Impact of Diagenesis And Hydrocarbon Emplacement on Sandstone Reservoir Quality of the Yanchang Formation (Upper Triassic) in the Ordos basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(5):664-673.
孙宁亮,钟建华,倪良田,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部上三叠统延长组物源分析及热演化[J].中国地质,2019,46(3):537-556. SUN Ningliang, ZHONG Jianhua, NI Liangtian, et al. Provenance analysis and thermal evolution of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Southern Ordos Basin[J]. Geology in China, 2019, 46(3):537-556(in Chinese with English abstract).
CHUHAN F A, BJØRLYKKE K, LOWREY C. The Role of Provenance in Illitization of Deeply Buried Reserevoir Sandstones from Haltenhanken and North Viking Graben, Off Shore Norway[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2000, 17(6):673-689.
BJØRLYKKE K, JAHREN J. Open or Closed Geochemical System during Diagenesis Insedimentary Basin:Constraints on Mass Transfer During Diagenesis and the Prediction of Porosity in Sandstone and Carbonate Reservoirs[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96:2193-2214.
FENG XU,DOU Wenchao, LIU Luofu, et al. Diagenetic Heterogeneity, Pore Throats Characteristic and their Effects on Reservoir Quality of the Upper Triassic Tight Sandstones of Vanchang Formation in Ordos Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 98:243-257.
WORDEN R I, MORAD S. Clay Mineral Cements in Sandstones[M]. Oxford:Blackwell Science Ltd, 2003.
WALDERHAUG O. Kinetic Modeling of Quartz Cementation and Porosity Loss in Deeply Buried Sandstone Reservoirs[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1996, 80(5):732-745.
PETTIJOHNF J, POTTER P E, SIEVER R. Sand and Sandstone[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1972.
HOUSEKNECHT D W. Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(6):633-642.
LUNDEFARD P D. Sandstone Porosity Loss:a "Big Picture" View of the Importance of Compaction[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1992, 62(2):250-260.
SURDAM R C, BOESE S W, CROSSEY L J. The Chemistry of Secondary Porosity[A]. In:Macdonald D A, Surdam R C, Eds. Clastic Diagenesis[C]. AAPG Memoir 37, 1984:127-151.
SURDAM R C, CROSSEY L J, HAGEN E S, et al. Organic-inorganic Interactions and Sandstone Diagenesis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73(1):1-32.
-
期刊类型引用(23)
1. 郭齐韵，吴华，李佳潼，徐悦，陈琳娜，周建伟. 基于机器学习与样本优化的滑坡易发性评价：以西藏自治区昌都市为例. 地质科学. 2025(01): 308-322 . 
百度学术
2. 申玉松，张宸，王艺杰，张迪. 基于CF-LR模型的河南省信阳市地质灾害易发性评价. 地质与资源. 2024(01): 74-81+134 . 百度学术
3. 高波，董英，贾俊，薛强，武文英，李林，王涛，刘港，江睿君. 甘肃临夏积石山县6.2级地震地质灾害发育特征及危险性评价. 西北地质. 2024(02): 209-219 . 本站查看
4. 任小凯，陈新杰，刘海亭，唐建文，熊平，向阳. 县域地质灾害调查与风险评价方法及工程实践. 西部探矿工程. 2024(08): 9-11+16 . 百度学术
5. 袁亚南，喻根，方斌. 基于GIS的空间TOPSIS模型的安徽省休宁县滑坡易发性评价. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(08): 1087-1093+1099 . 百度学术
6. 张云，资锋，曹运江，成湘伟，韩用顺，唐龙. GIS支持下基于归一化信息量模型的地质灾害易发性评价. 矿业工程研究. 2024(02): 20-28 . 百度学术
7. 孟晓捷，郭小鹏，薛强，冯卫，洪勃. 黄土地质灾害评价因子地形起伏度提取最佳尺度研究：以榆林市米脂县为例. 西北地质. 2024(06): 234-243 . 本站查看
8. 李小倩，钟储汉，孙如华，苏可，刘元杰. 基于GIS和加权信息量模型的普光气田滑坡危险性评价. 河北地质大学学报. 2023(02): 27-32 . 百度学术
9. 邹富宝，付卓，樊风雷，吴华，郭治兴. 基于频率比与AHP模型的西藏东部地区滑坡易发性评价. 自然灾害学报. 2023(02): 235-242 . 百度学术
10. 贾俊，毛伊敏，孟晓捷，高波，高满新，武文英. 深度随机森林和随机森林算法的滑坡易发性评价对比——以汉中市略阳县为例. 西北地质. 2023(03): 239-249 . 本站查看
11. 孟凡奇，高峰，林波，张京钊，徐金梁，牛伟. 基于AHP和信息量模型的地质灾害易发性评价——以鲁东片区为例. 灾害学. 2023(03): 111-117 . 百度学术
12. 张紫昭，张天栋，于喜坤，吕倩俐，赖润森，贾竣予，刘新宇. 新疆崩滑流地质灾害孕灾环境分区及其形成机制. 工程地质学报. 2023(04): 1129-1144 . 百度学术
13. 邱慧玲，龙文华，卿展晖. 模糊数学在滑坡治理工程后评价中的应用. 华南地震. 2023(04): 75-79 . 百度学术
14. 李璇琼，梁延龙. 地质灾害引发土地利用响应机制研究——以四川绵竹为例. 西北地质. 2022(01): 236-248 . 本站查看
15. 孟晓捷，张新社，曾庆铭，王冬. 基于加权信息量法的黄土滑坡易发性评价——以1∶5万天水市麦积幅为例. 西北地质. 2022(02): 249-259 . 本站查看
16. 马啸，王念秦，李晓抗，严冬，李嘉琳. 基于RF-FR模型的滑坡易发性评价——以略阳县为例. 西北地质. 2022(03): 335-344 . 本站查看
17. 孙翊翔，贾俊，张茂省，武文英. 基于斜坡单元下的AHP-信息量法在地质灾害易发性评价中的应用. 地质与资源. 2022(06): 811-820+832 . 百度学术
18. 刘文涛，向明智，陈林，张茂淳，胡华伟. 基于层次分析法的阆中市滑坡地质灾害易发性评价分析. 甘肃水利水电技术. 2022(09): 27-30 . 百度学术
19. 王高峰，郭宁，邓兵，田运涛，叶振南，陈宗良，吕凤兰，高幼龙. 不同组合模型区域滑坡易发性及精度分析. 西北地质. 2021(02): 259-272 . 本站查看
20. 袁康，崔玉龙，胡俊宏，金嘉乐，袁文华. 2019年“利奇马”台风暴雨滑坡分布分析——以安徽省宁国市为例. 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(03): 74-81 . 百度学术
21. 李宇新，邓念东，马建全，周阳，崔阳阳. 基于逻辑回归树和旋转森林模型的滑坡易发性评价. 科学技术与工程. 2021(23): 9725-9732 . 百度学术
22. 张超，朱元彩，韩旭. GIS技术在水文水资源分析管理中的评价指标体系建立与应用. 电子测试. 2021(18): 69-70+53 . 百度学术
23. 宋小川，刘汉湖，张春，周林博. 确定性系数模型的滑坡易发性评价应用与比较. 矿山测量. 2021(05): 65-71 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(26)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1381
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 1631
- 被引次数: 49
下载:
