基于RF-FR模型的滑坡易发性评价——以略阳县为例

马啸; 王念秦; 李晓抗; 严冬; 李嘉琳

doi:10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2022.03.028

基于RF-FR模型的滑坡易发性评价——以略阳县为例

1. 陕西工程勘察研究院有限公司, 陕西西安 710068;
2. 西安科技大学地质与环境学院, 陕西西安 710054;
3. 陕西乾和实业有限公司, 陕西西安 710000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目“黄土山区城镇化行为过程与地质环境耦合机制”（41572287）；陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目“神府矿区矿山地质环境保护及其综合治理技术研究”（2016KTCL03-19）。

详细信息

作者简介:
马啸(1995-),男,硕士,研究方向为岩土体稳定与地质灾害防治。E-mail:624540304@qq.com。

通讯作者:
王念秦(1964-),男,教授,博士,主要从事岩土体稳定与地质灾害防治教学和科研工作。E-mail:younglock@163.com。

中图分类号: P642.22
计量
- 文章访问数: 75
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 33
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-07-11
- 修回日期: 2022-01-10
- 网络出版日期: 2022-08-25

Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Based on RF-FR Model: Taking Lueyang County as an Example

1. Shaanxi Engineering Investigation Research Institute Co. LTD, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, China;
2. College of Geology and Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China;
3. Shaanxi Qianhe Industrial Co., LTD, Xi'an, 710000, Shaanxi, China

摘要

摘要: 滑坡易发性评价是指导区域滑坡初步预警、预报的重要手段。为提高县域滑坡易发性评价的准确性，以随机森林模型（RF）、频率比模型（FR）为基础模型，结合2种模型的优越性，建立随机森林-频率比模型（RF-FR），进行滑坡易发性评价。以略阳县域为研究区，选取高程、坡向、坡度、地层、地表粗糙度、距断层的距离、曲率、距道路的距离、地形湿度指数、距河流的距离及降雨量等14项影响因子建立数据库，采用Spearman方法对各因子相关性进行分析，剔除地形起伏度等3项相关性较高的评价因子，并基于滑坡相对点密度（LRPD）进行评价因子分析。结果表明：①滑坡灾害点与线状因子的距离呈负相关，即距离越近，灾害点越多。②FR、RF、RF-FR模型预测率分别为84.3%、90.1%、95.0%，RF-FR模型较FR、RF模型预测精度分别提高了10.7%、4.9%。③RF-FR模型的滑坡灾害点在高、极高易发区的比例比FR、RF模型分别提高了15.89%、5.29%。
- 滑坡易发性 /
- 频率比模型 /
- 随机森林模型 /
- RF-FR模型 /
- 滑坡相对点密度
Abstract: The assessment of landslide susceptibility is an important means to guide the preliminary early warning and forecast of regional landslide. In order to improve the accuracy of landslide susceptibility evaluation in county area, random forest model (RF) and frequency ratio model (FR) were used as the basic models, and RF-FR was established to evaluate landslide susceptibility combined with the advantages of the two models. In Lueyang county domain for the study area, selection of elevation, slope direction, slope, formation, surface roughness, the distance from the fault, curvature and the distance from the road, terrain humidity index, the distance from the river, a database of 14 factors such as rainfall, by adopting the method of Spearman correlation analysis of each factor, eliminate topographic relief degree of three high correlation of evaluation factors, and evaluate the relative point density (LRPD) based on landslide factor analysis. The results show that:①there is a negative correlation between the distance between landslide disaster points and linear factors, that is, the closer the distance is, the more disaster points are. ②The prediction rates of FR, RF and RF-FR models are 84.3%, 90. 1% and 95.0%, respectively. Compared with FR and RF models, the prediction accuracy of RF-FR model is 10.7% and 4.9% higher than that of FR and RF models. ③The proportion of landslide disaster points in high and extremely high-risk areas of 4RFmurFR model is 15.89% and 5.29% higher than that of FR and RF model, respectively.
- landslide susceptibility /
- frequency ratio model /
- random forests model /
- the RF-FR model /
- the relative point density

HTML全文

参考文献(26)

孙果梅, 况明生, 曲华.陕西秦巴山区地质灾害研究[J].水土保持研究, 2005, 21(05):244-247.

SUN Guomei, KUANG Mingsheng, QU Hua.Reserch of Geological Disaster in Qinling-Bashan Mountains[J].Reserch of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 21(05):244-247.

殷坤龙, 张桂荣.地质灾害风险区划与综合防治对策[J].安全与环境工程, 2003, 10(01):32-35.

YIN Kunlong, ZHANG Guirong. Risk Zonation of Geo-hazards and Its Comprehensive Control[J].Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2003, 10(01):32-35.

王高峰, 郭宁, 邓兵, 等.不同组合模型区域滑坡易发性及精度分析[J].西北地质, 2021, 54(02):259-272.

WANG Gaofeng, GUO Ning, DENG Bing, et al.Analysis of Landslide Susceptility and Accuracy in Different Combination Models[J].Northwestern Geology, 2021, 54(02):259-272.

胡涛, 樊鑫, 王硕, 等.基于逻辑回归模型和3S技术的思南县滑坡易发性评价[J].地质科技通报, 2020, 39(02):113-121.

HU Tao, FAN Xin, WANG Shuo, et al. Landslide Susceptility Evaluation of Geological Sinan County Using Logistics Regression Model and 3Stechology[J] Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(02):113-121.

许冲, 戴福初, 姚鑫, 等.GIS支持下基于层次分析法的汶川地震区滑坡易发性评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(S2):3978-3985.

XU Chong, DAI Fuchu, YAO Xin, et al.GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Analytical Hierarchy Process in Wenchuan Earthquake Region[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(S2):3978-3985.

高克昌, 崔鹏, 赵纯勇, 等.基于地理信息系统和信息量模型的滑坡危险性评价——以重庆万州为例[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(05):991-996.

GAO Kechang, CUI Peng, ZHAO Chunyong, et al. Langslide Hazard Evaluation of Wanzhou Based on GIS Information Value Method in the Three Gorges Reservoir[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(05):991-996.

齐信, 黄波林, 刘广宁, 等.基于GIS技术和频率比模型的三峡地区秭归向斜盆地滑坡敏感性评价[J]. 地质力学学报, 2017, 23(01):97-104.

QI Xin, HUANG Bolin, LIU Guangning, et al. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in The Three Gorges Area, China, Zigui Synclinal Basin, Using GIS Technology and Frequency Ratio Model[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 23(01):97-104.

刘月, 王宁涛, 周超, 等.基于ROC曲线与确定性系数法集成模型的三峡库区奉节县滑坡易发性评价[J].安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(04):61-70.

LIU Yue, WANG Ningtao, ZHOU Chao, et al. Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Based on ROC and Certainty Factor Method in Fengjie County, Three Gorges Reservoir[J].Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2020, 27(04):61-70.

王念秦, 郭有金, 刘铁铭, 等.基于支持向量机模型的滑坡危险性评价[J].科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(35):70-78.

WANG Nianqin, GUO Youjin, LIU Tieming, et al. Landslide susceptibility assessment based on support vector machine model[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(35):70-78.

郭子正, 殷坤龙, 黄发明, 等.基于滑坡分类和加权频率比模型的滑坡易发性评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(02):287-300.

GUO Zizheng, YIN Shenlong, HUANG Faming, et al. Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Based on Landslide Classification and Weighted Frequency Ratio Model[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(02):287-300.

邱维蓉, 吴帮玉, 潘学树, 等.几种聚类优化的机器学习方法在灵台县滑坡易发性评价中的应用[J].西北地质, 2020, 53(01):222-233.

QIU Weirong, WU Bangyu, PAN Xueshu, et al.Application of Several Cluster-optimization-based Machine Learning Methodsin Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility in Lingtai County[J].Northwestern Geology, 2020, 53(01):222-233.

吴常润, 赵冬梅, 刘澄静, 等.基于GIS和信息量模型的陇川县滑坡易发性评价[J].西北地质, 2020, 53(02):308-320.

WU Changrun, ZHAO Dongmei, LIU Chengjing, et al.Landslide Susceptibility Assessment of Longchuan County Based on GIS and Information Value Model[J].Northwestern Geology, 2020, 53(02):308-320.

Cheng Wei, Xie Xiaoshen, Peng Jianbing, et al.GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using anovel hybrid integration approach of bivariate statisticalbased random forestmethod[J].Catena, 2018, 164(01):135-14.

Cao J, Zhang Z, Wang C Z, etal. Susceptibility assessment of landslides triggered by earthquakes in the Western Sichuan Plateau[J]. Catena, 2019, 175(02):63-76.

施引文献(30)

期刊类型引用(15)

1.	王洁，林诚杰，梁峰铭，季静静，谈松林，刘宇. 基于不同机器学习模型的滑坡易发性分析及适应性评估. 科学技术与工程. 2025(02): 513-520 . 百度学术
2.	冯旻譞，毛伊敏，贾俊，齐琦，孟晓捷，刘港，高波，高满新. 地质灾害危险性评价中不同机器学习方法优劣对比：以宁强县大安镇为例. 中国地质. 2025(01): 205-214 . 百度学术
3.	王本栋，李四全，许万忠，杨勇，李永云. 基于3种不同机器学习算法的滑坡易发性评价对比研究. 西北地质. 2024(01): 34-43 . 本站查看
4.	刘亚静，刘红健. 基于信息量-随机森林模型的地震带地质灾害易发性评价：以松潘-较场地震带为例. 科学技术与工程. 2024(01): 143-154 . 百度学术
5.	赖滨泓，王浩，豆红强. 基于松散耦合方法的弃土场边坡三维建模及稳定性分析：以福州市闽清县白樟池埔建筑弃土场为例. 科学技术与工程. 2024(03): 1184-1191 . 百度学术
6.	郭飞，蒋广辉，黄晓虎，王秀娟，夏栋，陈洋，李小伟. 环境因子组合和负样本选取策略对花岗岩区崩岗易发性评价的影响. 农业工程学报. 2024(01): 191-200 . 百度学术
7.	陈宾，李颖懿，张联志，屈添强，魏娜，刘宁，黄春林. 地质灾害易发性评价因子分级的AIFFC算法优化. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(01): 72-81 . 百度学术
8.	杜鹏，陈宁生，伍康林，李志，张瀛玉龙. 基于随机森林模型的藏东南地区滑坡易发性评价及主控因素分析. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(02): 328-344 . 百度学术
9.	陈芯宇，师芸，赵侃，温永啸. 基于CF融入SSA优化SVM和RF模型的滑坡易发性评价. 西安理工大学学报. 2024(01): 121-131+142 . 百度学术
10.	杨智强，魏中凯，李锐鹏. 渑池县地质灾害敏感因子分析及易发性评价. 粉煤灰综合利用. 2024(03): 86-90+96 . 百度学术
11.	周一文，赵德刚，马丙太，王颖，范成博，彭程. 基于WIM的地质灾害易发性评价——以遵化市为例. 能源与环保. 2024(06): 107-115 . 百度学术
12.	臧烨祺，郭永刚，苏立彬，王国闻，吴升杰，秦得顺. 西藏东南地区滑坡易发性多模型评价方法研究. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(06): 58-69 . 百度学术
13.	魏文豪，贾雨霏，盛逸凡，徐光黎，杨宜军，张端淼. 基于I、SVM、I-SVM的滑坡灾害易发性评价模型研究. 安全与环境工程. 2023(03): 136-144 . 百度学术
14.	王盈，袁仁茂. 基于频率比-层次分析法的金沙江巧家段滑坡灾害易发性评价. 河北地质大学学报. 2023(04): 131-140 . 百度学术
15.	王伟中，曹小红，汪鑫，于洋，李平平，王伟华. 基于信息量法的新疆伊宁县滑坡灾害易发性评价. 新疆地质. 2022(04): 566-573 . 百度学术