ISSN 1009-6248CN 61-1149/P 双月刊

主管单位:中国地质调查局

主办单位:中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心
中国地质学会

    • 中文核心期刊
    • CSCD收录期刊
    • 中国科技核心期刊
    • Scopus收录期刊
高级检索

矿井涌水量预测方法的比较研究——以甘肃大庄煤矿为例

张子祥, 李文鑫

张子祥, 李文鑫. 矿井涌水量预测方法的比较研究——以甘肃大庄煤矿为例[J]. 西北地质, 2022, 55(3): 355-360. DOI: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2022.03.030
引用本文: 张子祥, 李文鑫. 矿井涌水量预测方法的比较研究——以甘肃大庄煤矿为例[J]. 西北地质, 2022, 55(3): 355-360. DOI: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2022.03.030
ZHANG Zixiang, LI Wenxin. Comparative Study on Prediction Methods of Mine Inflow—A Case Study of Dazhuang Coal Mine in Gansu Province[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2022, 55(3): 355-360. DOI: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2022.03.030
Citation: ZHANG Zixiang, LI Wenxin. Comparative Study on Prediction Methods of Mine Inflow—A Case Study of Dazhuang Coal Mine in Gansu Province[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2022, 55(3): 355-360. DOI: 10.19751/j.cnki.61-1149/p.2022.03.030

矿井涌水量预测方法的比较研究——以甘肃大庄煤矿为例

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张子祥(1964-),男,注册岩土工程师、正高级工程师,主要从事水文地质、工程地质、煤田地质。E-mail:575796981@qq.com。

  • 中图分类号: P618.11;TD742

Comparative Study on Prediction Methods of Mine Inflow—A Case Study of Dazhuang Coal Mine in Gansu Province

  • 摘要: 矿井涌水量是矿井设计、生产和防排水系统设置及制定矿井防治水措施的主要依据;涌水量预测方式的选择十分重要。笔者采用大井法、廊道法和比拟法对大庄煤矿矿井涌水量进行了计算,并和矿井实际涌水量进行了误差分析,结果表明:①吉哈尔特和库萨金经验公式求出的影响半径一般偏小很多,造成矿井涌水量计算结果偏大,在实践中不适用。②矿井生产阶段比拟法比解析法要更加精确。③在解析法预测涌水量中,建议使用实测影响半径,若无法取得,建议用补给模数法公式计算引用影响半径。④在解析法中,若已有生产矿井的涌水量资料,可考虑利用大井法、集水廊道法公式反求影响半径,在此基础上计算矿井涌水量。若补给条件差,以消耗储存量为主的生产矿井,矿井涌水量计算建议首先采用适合边界条件的非稳定流泰斯公式预测涌水量。
    Abstract: Mine inflow is the main basis of mine design, production, drainage system and water prevention and control measures.It is very important to choose the prediction method of water inflow.This paper adopted the method, corridor method, analogy method in the coal mine water inflow of Dazhuang colliery was calculated, and the error analysis and the actual location of the mine, the results show that:①George Hal and library sargent empirical formula and the smaller the radius of influence of general many, cause water inflow slants big, calculation results is not applicable in practice.②Comparison method is more accurate than analytical method in mine production stage.③It is recommended to use the measured influence radius in the analytic method to predict the inflow of water. If it cannot be obtained, it is recommended to use the formula of runoff recharge module to calculate the reference influence radius.④In the analytical method, if the existing in the production of the mine water inflow data, can consider to use big well method, water corridor method formula reverse radius of influence, on the basis of the calculation of mine water inflow, if supply condition is poor, mainly consume storage production mine, the mine water inflow of unsteady flow calculation suggest suitable boundary conditions were first introduced in theis formula to predict water inflow.
  • 管恩太, 武强.矿井涌水量预测评述[J].中州煤炭, 2005, (1):7-8.
    张子祥, 张兴隆. 甘肃华亭矿区大庄井田勘探报告[R]. 兰州, 2006.

    ZHANG Zixiang, ZHANG Xinglong. Exploration Report of Liujiahe Well Field in Gansu Huating Mining Area[R].Lanzhou, 2006.

    华解明."大井法"预测矿井涌水量问题探讨[J].中国煤炭地质, 2009, 21(6):45-47.

    HUA Jieming. Questioning on Mine Water Inflow "Virtual Large Diameter Well" Method Prediction[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2009, 21(6):45-47.

    陈酩知, 刘树才, 杨国勇.矿井涌水量预测方法的发展[J].工程地球物理学报, 2009, 6(1):68-72.

    CHEN Mingzhi, LIU Shucai, YANG Guoyong.The Development of Mining Water Inflow Predict Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2009, 6(1):68-72.

    戴岩柯, 崔世新, 张坤.水均衡法和数值模拟法在矿坑深部涌水量预测中的比较-以西石门铁矿为例[J].地下水, 2010, 32(1):24-48.

    DAI Yanke, CUI Shixi, ZHANG Kun.Comparison of water equalization method and numerical simulation method in prediction of water inflow in deep mine-Take Xishimen Iron Mine as an example[J].Ground Water, 2010, 32(1):24-48.

    温文富, 曹文丽.比拟法和解析法在某矿井涌水量预测中的分析比较[J].煤炭科技·地质与勘探, 2011, 37(7):38-39.

    WEN Wenfu, CAO Wenli.Comparative analysis for analogue method and analytical method in prediction of water inflow in some coal mine[J].Coal Science and Technology Geology and Exploration, 2011, 37(7):38-39.

    杨海军, 王广才.煤矿突水水源判别与水量预测方法综述[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2012, 40(3):48-58.

    YANG Haijun, WANG Guangcai.Summarization of methods of distinguishing sources and forecasting inflow of water inrush in coal mines[J].Coal Geology Exploration, 2012, 40(3):48-58.

    段俭君, 徐会军, 王子河.相关分析法在矿井涌水量预测中的应用[J].煤炭科学技术, 2013, 41(6):114-116.

    DUAN Jianjun, XU Huijun, WANG Zihe.Correlational Analysis Method Applied to Prediction of Mine Water Inflow Quantity[J].Coal Technology, 2013, 41(6):114-116.

    张子祥.甘肃核桃峪煤矿矿井涌水量的计算与分析[J].中国煤炭地质, 2015, 27(2):32-56.

    ZHANG Zixiang.Estimation and Analysis of Mine Water Inflow in Hetaoyu Coalmine, Gansu[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2015, 27(2):32-56.

    虎维岳, 闫丽.对矿井涌水量预测问题的分析与思考[J].煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(1):13-38.

    HU Weiyue, YAN Li.Analysis and consideration on prediction problems of mine water inflow volume[J].Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(1):13-38.

    张奔, 谢小平.矿井涌水原因分析及涌水量预测研究[J].煤炭技术, 2021, 40(7):109-113.

    ZHANG Ben, XIE Xiaoping.Analysis of Causing Water Inflow in Mine and Research of Water Inflow Prediction[J].Coal Technology, 2021, 40(7):109-113.

  • 期刊类型引用(5)

    1. 孟令华,朱礼敏,邢香粉,杨树杰,马明永. 基于分类组合评价方法的地下水质量综合评价——以泰安市城区为例. 干旱区资源与环境. 2023(11): 110-116 . 百度学术
    2. 吴君毅,刘洪,欧阳渊,李樋,张景华,张腾蛟,黄勇,段声义. 螺髻山北麓地下水化学特征与水质评价. 西北地质. 2023(05): 151-164 . 本站查看
    3. 李亚楠,胡春春,康莹,张新,刘冬跃,李心月. 北京市东北部地区地下水水质状况及变化特征. 广西水利水电. 2023(06): 38-44 . 百度学术
    4. 李媛媛. 近30年德令哈市东南部地下水埋深动态变化规律探究. 地下水. 2021(06): 98-102 . 百度学术
    5. Xue-ru Wen,Yan-pei Cheng,Jian-kang Zhang,Hua Dong. Ecological function zoning and protection of groundwater in Asia. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering. 2021(04): 359-368 . 必应学术

    其他类型引用(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  91
  • HTML全文浏览量:  7
  • PDF下载量:  37
  • 被引次数: 7
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-07-25
  • 修回日期:  2021-12-17
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-08-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回