Benefit Evaluation of Debris Flow Control Engineering Based on the FLO-2D Model
-
摘要: 泥湾沟为白龙江一级支沟，沟内地质构造发育，固体松散物质丰富，历史上曾爆发多次大规模泥石流灾害，属典型暴雨型黏性泥石流。为更好的对该工程效益进行评价，本次采用FLO-2D模型对其治理前后不同频率的泥石流运动、堆积情况及危险性进行模拟对比。研究结果表明，防治工程的布设能有效拦截流域内松散物质，拦截方量约为3.97×104m3，回淤反压稳固坡体效果更加明显；泥石流流速控制作用明显，1%降雨频率下到达沟口处流速为2.7m/s，且呈沿拦挡工程逐级减小的趋势。在松散物质及流速得到有效控制的情况下，泥石流冲出方量减少，堆积范围缩小，缩小比例最大达84%。该方法不仅有利于评价泥石流治理效益，也对泥石流治理方案的提出提供有效的数据支持，是值得借鉴与参考的一种评价方法。Abstract: The Niwangou ditch is the first tributary of Bailong River, where the geological structures are very developed and the loose materials are abundant. In history, there happened several large-scale debris flow disasters, which belong to typical rainstorm viscous debris flow. For the better benefit evaluation of debris flow control engineering, the FLO-2D model has been applied to simulate and compare the debris flow movement, accumulation, and risk under different frequency before and after the treatment. The results show that the loose material originally accumulated at the exit of gully will be intercepted in the dam body with the volume of 3.97×104 m3 by the control engineering. Moreover, the flow velocity of debris flow can be effectively controlled, and the maximum flow velocity at the exit of gully is 2.7m/s when the rainfall frequency is 1%. And this engineering will limit the accumulation range of debris flow, the reduction ratio can be greater than 84%. The method is not only to the benefit of evaluation of debris flow control engineering, it also provides the effective data support to the treatment scheme. Overall, the evaluation method is a worth reference by researchers.
-
-
唐邦兴,周必凡,吴积善,等. 中国泥石流[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2000. TANG Bangxing,ZHOU Bifan, WU Jishan,et al.Debris Flow in China[M].Beijing:Business Press,2000.
李智毅,杨裕云.工程地质学概论[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2012:176. LI Zhiyi,YANG Yuyun. An Introduction to Engineering Geology[M].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,2012:176.
唐得胜.基于FLO-2D 模型的不同频率泥石流数值模拟研究[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2014. TANG Desheng. The numerical simulation study on the debris-flow in different frequency base on FLO-2D[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2014.
夏添.震区泥石流危险性评价及预警减灾系统研究[D].成都:成都理工大学, 2013. XIA Tian. Hazard assessment of debris flow in earthquakeregion and system design for warning and mitigation[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2013.
唐川,刘希林,朱静.泥石流堆积泛滥区危险度的评价与应用[J].自然灾害学报,1993,2(4):79-84. TANG Chuan,LIU Xilin,ZHU Jing. Assessment and Application of Risk Degree in Debris Flow Accumulation Flood Area[J].Journal of Natural Disasters, 1993,2(4):79-84.
杨海龙,樊小一,姜元俊.基于FLO-2D的泥石流工程治理效果分析[J]. 人民长江,2017,48(17):66-71. YANG Hailong,FAN Xiaoyi,JIANG Yuanjun. Analysis of Debris Flow Control Effect Based on FLO-2D[J].Yangtze River, 2017,48(17):66-71.
杜雪剑,孙淑勤,赵峥,等.基于FLO-2D模型的红椿沟泥石流工程治理效果研究[J].地球与环境,2016,44(3):376-381. DU Xuejian,SUN Shuqin,ZHAO Zheng,et al. Study on Debris Flow Control Effect of Hongchungou Based on FLO-2D Model[J].Earth and Environment, 2016,44(3):376-381.
马富存,袁术.陇南市武都区两水镇泥湾沟泥石流灾害治理工程[R].兰州:甘肃地质工程勘察院,2008. MA Fucun,YUAN Shu. Debris Flow Control Project of Niwan Ditch in Liangshui Town, Wudu District, Longnan City[R]. Lanzhou:Gansu Institute of Geological Engineering Investigation,2008.
LIN J Y,Yang M D,Lin B R,et al. Risk assessment of debris flows in Songhe Stream,Taiwan[J].Engineering Geology,2011,123(1):100-112.
JAKOB M., HUNGR O. Debris-flow hazards and related phenolmena[M]. Chichester:Praxis Publi-shing Ltd, 2005, 519-538
LIN C. W., SHIEH C. L., YU B. D., et al. Impact of Chi-Chi earthquake on the occurrence of land-slides and debris flows:example from the Chenyulan River watershed, Nantou, Taiwan[J].Engineering Geology, 2003,71:49-61.
-
期刊类型引用(14)
1. 连志鹏，陈宇，章昱，厉一宁，刘磊，谭建民. 普适型滑坡地质灾害监测预警——以湖南省溆浦县为例. 中国地质调查. 2025(01): 140-149 . 
百度学术
2. 孙金辉，佘涛. 基于普适型监测预警体系中多参数模型研究——以云南省保山市大园子滑坡为例. 钻探工程. 2024(03): 54-59 . 百度学术
3. 田婉婷，郭富赟，火飞飙. 基于普适型仪器监测的滑坡预警成功案例分析与启示——以灵台县中台镇水泉村尹家沟岭社滑坡为例. 甘肃科学学报. 2024(04): 9-17 . 百度学术
4. 邓华锋，肖瑶，李建林，王文东，张景昱，宛良朋，王团乐. 干热河谷岸坡消落带砂岩节理劣化机制研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(08): 1839-1851 . 百度学术
5. 陈全明，黄炜敏，李姣. 基于改进切线角和变形速率的滑坡预警——以湖南省石门县雷家山滑坡为例. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2024(05): 133-140 . 百度学术
6. 王豪，何朝阳，巨能攀，马志刚，刘洋，孟睿，解明礼，肖洋. 多设备多参数联动的滑坡预警方法. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 1057-1069 . 百度学术
7. 李璐，徐根祺，杨倩，王艳娥，赵正健. 基于Xgboost优化的KELM滑坡预报模型研究. 计算机测量与控制. 2023(04): 225-231 . 百度学术
8. 邓李政，袁宏永，张鸣之，陈建国. 滑坡变形监测预警技术研究进展. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(06): 849-864 . 百度学术
9. 李璐，张永强，窦婉婷，马媛，王悦，程良. 基于STM8L的滑坡灾害在线监测预测系统. 微处理机. 2023(04): 51-55 . 百度学术
10. 王朋伟，安玉科. 滑坡匀速变形阶段快速诊断方法研究. 西北地质. 2023(05): 197-203 . 本站查看
11. 崔华丽，谯鹏志，王佃明. 库水位变动情况下库岸边坡稳定性研究——以白鹤滩水电站石圪垴滑坡为例. 钻探工程. 2023(05): 36-42 . 百度学术
12. 马娟，张鸣之，齐干，叶思卿，黄喆，丁帆. 地质灾害监测复杂场景下压电式雨量计精度标定及适宜性分析. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2023(05): 91-96 . 百度学术
13. 夏波，任烨，王军. 现代化信息技术在地质灾害监测预警中的应用分析. 信息系统工程. 2022(09): 67-70 . 百度学术
14. 赵文祎，马娟，常啸寅，庞骁. 一种面向降雨型滑坡的降雨—变形综合预警智能决策方法. 地理与地理信息科学. 2022(06): 17-22 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1733
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 1673
- 被引次数: 16
下载:
